Sri U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.—Aggrieved by the dismissal of plaintiff’s suit in O.S.No.81 of 1992 by the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla in his judgment dated 29.04.2000, the instant appeal is preferred.

2. The parties in the appeal are referred as they stood before the trial Court.

3. The factual matrix of the case is thus:

(a) The suit-O.S.No.81 of 1992 was filed by plaintiff for declaration of title and consequential possession of plaint A schedule properties and other reliefs. Her case is that item No.1 of the plaint A schedule property i.e, wet land admeasuring Ac.1-61 cents covered by Sy.No.428/2 of Kondamudi village and item No.2 of the plaint A schedule property i.e, house bearing Door Nos.417 to 420 (corresponding to earlier Door No.362 in Railpet), 5th block of Ponnur Municipality admeasuring Ac.0-17 cents originally belonged to her maternal grandfather i.e, Anumarlapudi Nagabhushana Rao. The plaintiff’s grandfather had only one issue by name Seetharavamma, who is the mother of plaintiff and 1st defendant. The said Nagabhushana Rao executed a will dated 11.08.1919, during his lifetime in a sound and disposing state of mind bequeathing the plaint A schedule property i