A.K.RATH
Ramakrushna Mudra – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Mudra – Respondent
Dr. A.K.Rath, J.—This petition assails the order dated 15.2.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Puri in Civil Suit No.81 of 2004. By the said order, the learned trial court rejected the application of the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for impleadment.
2. Opposite party no.1 as plaintiff instituted Civil Suit No.81 of 2004 in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Puri for declaration that he has right, title and interest to perform Mudra Seva Pali in Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri as the successor of late Jagannath Mudra, the order passed in Sadhi Bandha Misc.Case No.4 of 1995 is illegal and inoperative and for permanent injunction impleading the opposite parties 2 to 6 as defendants. The case of the plaintiff is that Artatrana Mudra is the common ancestor of the parties. He had three sons, namely, Loknath, Chintamani and Jagannath. They were performing Mudra Seva in Shree Jagannath Temple. Mudra Seva is heritable and transferable. Pursuant to the order dated 13.5.1980 in Case No.6 of 1979 of the Administrator, Shri Jagannath Temple, Puridefendant no.5, Jagannath Mudra was performing Mudra Seva. After the death of Lokanath, Chintamani
Anil Kumar Singh v. Shivnath Mishra and Gadasa Guru
Sumtibai and others v. Paras Finance Co. Regd. Partnership Firm
Kali Kinkor Ganguly v. Panna Banerjee and others
Anokhe Lal v. Radhamohan Bansal and others
Radhey Shyam and another v. Chhabi Nath and others
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.