SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.S.SONAK
Siddharth N. Banthia – Appellant
Versus
Smitha S. Banthia – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.D. Soni i/b. M/s. Ram & Co.

JUDGMENT

M.S. Sonak, J.—Heard Mr. Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner husband challenges the order dated 4th June 2016 made by the Family Court, Pune rejecting the petitioner’s application under Section 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to stay the proceedings, i.e., Petition No. 84 of 2012, in which, the respondent - wife, has applied for declaration that her marriage with the petitioner is null and void.

3. The petitioner, applied for stay of proceedings in the civil suit on the ground that the respondent wife has initiated criminal proceedings alleging that the petitioner has committed offences under sections 420, 406, 467, 471, 474, 376, 323, 504, 506(1) and 494 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and such proceedings are pending in the Sessions Court, Pune.

4. Mr. Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that unless the civil proceedings are stayed, the petitioner, will face sever embarrassment in the criminal proceedings before the Sessions Court. Mr. Soni submits that complicated questions of law and fact are involved in both the matters and therefore, applying the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of M

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top