Trilochan Singh VS Manpreet Kaur

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Trilochan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manpreet Kaur – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Atul Kumar, Niteesh Kumar and Seema Gupta, Advocates
For the Respondents:Sumit K. Srivastava, Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.—The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.07.2012 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.11, District Pratapgarh in Criminal Appeal No.72 of 2011 as well as order dated 18.08.2011 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh in Criminal Case No.2441 of 2010 under Section 12/18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violance Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2. Respondent No.1 is the daughter of the petitioner who had instituted a Criminal Complaint No.2441 of 2010 under Section 12/18 of the Act in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh against her father. From the facts as narrated, the petitioner with his wife has four daughters and two sons and their details are given as under:—

S.No.	Name	Age	Status	Qualification
1.	Daljeet Kaur	40	Married	Doctor
2.	Bhawan Jeet Kaur	35	Married	M.A. in two subjects prior to marriage
3.	Gurjeet Singh	33	Unmarried	Post Graduate M.A.
4.	Jasmeet Kaur	33	Unmarried	Post Graduate M.A.
5.	Manpreet Kaur	29	Unmarried	M.A. while residing with the petitioner
6.	Charanjeet Singh	26	Unmarr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DINESH KUMAR SINGHTrilochan Singh – AppellantVersusManpreet Kaur – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Trilochan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manpreet Kaur – Respondent