SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
In the Goods of: Reba Mitra and Sharad Subramanyan – Appellant
Versus
Soumi Majumdar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sahidullah Munshi, J.—This suit arises out of P.L.A. 325 of 2001 filed by the executors of the alleged last Will and Testament of the deceased seeking grant of probate of the said Will executed by the deceased on 21st October, 1992 and Codicil to the said Will executed on 21st June, 1998 to leave granted by this Hon’ble Court vide its order dated 14th May, 2013, caveat was permitted to be filed and in support of such caveat affidavit was also filed by the defendants Soumi Majumder and Shantanu Bose on 26th July, 2013, as a result of which the probate application became contentious and P.L.A. 325 of 2001 has been converted into Testamentary Suit. Probate application (now converted into plaint) disclosed that the deceased Reba Mitra, a Hindu governed by the Dayavaga School of Hindu Law, died testate on 27th November, 1998 leaving behind a Will dated 21st October, 1992 being her last Will and Testament in English language and character. The said Will was registered with the Registrar of Assurances, Calcutta on 21st October, 1992. The deceased also executed a Codicil of the
Hem Nolini Judah –Vs. – Isaolyne Sarojbashini Bose
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka –Vs. – Jasjit Singh reported in (1990) 2 SCC 507 – Distinguished.
Ghulam Qadir –Vs. – Special Tribunal
Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon –vs. – Hardyal Singh Dhillon
Krishna Kumar Birla –Vs. – Rejendra Singh Lodha
Goods of Abha Rani Sinha, in re
Jayamma –Vs. Maria Bai (dead by proposed LRS.) & Ors.
Shoilesh Chandra Mustafi –Vs. Amal Chandra Mustafi
Atulabala Dasi –Vs. – Nirupama Devi
T. Arvandanam –Vs. – T.V. Satyapal
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.