SANJEEV NARULA
Sukruti Dugal – Appellant
Versus
Jahnavi Dugal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J.—
I.A. 3975/2019 (under Order 6 Rule 17) & I.A. 3976/2019 (under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC)
1. This judgment shall dispose of the two applications, one filed by the Plaintiff [IA No. 3975/2019-under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the plaint] and another one filed by Defendant No. 3 [I.A No. 3976/2019-under Order 7 Rule 11(a) read with Section 151 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint]
2. The present suit seeks relief of partition, rendition of accounts and permanent injunction. As per the facts narrated in the plaint, the case of the Plaintiff is that Late Sh. Somnath Dandona was the Karta of the Hindu Undivided Family (hereinafter referred to as “HUF”) and the parties to the present suit are the members/coparceners of the HUF who were living under a common roof. The assets of the HUF comprise of the following immovable properties:- (a) House No. 275, ground floor, Kailash Hills, New Delhi. (b)House No. E-25, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. (c) Plot No. 77, Karanpur Road, Dehradun, Uttaranchal.
3. It is contended that Late Sh. Somnath Dandona expired on 25th March 2008 and his widow Late Smt. Shyam Kumari Dandona died on 5th F
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Ors v. K.K. Modi and Ors
Mohinder Kumar Mehra v. Roop Rani Mehra and Ors
Abdul Rehnam and Anr v. Mohd Ruldu and Ors
Sunny (Minor) & Anr vs. Raj Singh & Ors
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.