Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. VS Uday Shankar Paul

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Uday Shankar Paul – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants :Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.1-9:Mr. Rahul Kumar Gupta, Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kundan Kumar Jaiswal, Advocates
For the Respondent Nos.10-15:Mr. M.K. Laik, Sr. Advocate Ms. Mohua Palit, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.16-18:Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambastha, Advocates
For the Respondent No.19:Mr. Manjul Prasad, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Dilip Kumar Prasad, Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.20-21: Mr. Praveen Akhouri, S.C. (Mines)-I Mr. Deva Kant Roy, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-I
For the Respondent No.22:Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent No.23:Mr. Ashish Kumar Shekhar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

F.A. No. 43 of 2012

Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011/06.01.2012, in T.S. No.76 of 2006 by Senior Civil Judge-I, Dhanbad.

2. Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are the present appellants. Respondent Nos.1 to 9 are the Plaintiffs including their legal representatives. Respondent Nos.10 to 15 are the intervenor defendants (D-5 to D-10) from whom the D-1 to D-3 claim to derive title by sale. Notices were issued on respondent Nos.10-15 vide order dated 15.04.2015 and substituted service was effected by publication of notice in the newspaper which were declared to be validly served on these respondents. Respondent No.20 State of Jharkhand, Respondent No.21-D.C., Dhanbad and Respondent No.22- Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA) have been impleaded vide order dated 29.11.2019. Respondent No. 23 is M/s Asarfi Hospital Pvt. Ltd in whose favour 11.92 acre of Gairabad Khas Khata land was transferred by Respondent No.22 has been impleaded vide order dated 03.03. 2022. Claim of R-23 depends on the State claim over the plots transferred to it.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARYSahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. – AppellantVersusUday Shankar Paul – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Uday Shankar Paul – Respondent