SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, K.MANMADHA RAO
Tamanampudi Vijaya Bhavani – Appellant
Versus
Tamanampudi Vijaya Kumar Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:S Subba Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent:N Subba Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT (COMMON)

Dr. Justice K.Manmadha Rao, J.—Aggrieved by the Common Order, dated 31.03.2005, passed in O.P. 55 of 2002 and O.P. 27 of 2004 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, allowing the application filed by the Respondent/Husband for divorce, while dismissing the application filed by the Appellant/Wife for restitution of conjugal rights, the present Appeals came to be filed.

2. The facts, in the O.P. No.55 of 2002, are as under:—

(i) The marriage between the Respondent/Husband and Appellant/Wife herein was solemnized on 07.05.1998. Out of the wedlock, a female child, by name Pratyusha was born on 11.09.1999. It is said that, at the time of marriage the parents of the Appellant/Wife promised to give Ac.5.00 of land and a portion of house to her towards pasupukunkuma. It is further said that Rs. 1,50,000/- was given to Respondent/Husband in the presence of elders, by name, Nallamilli Venkata Krishna Reddy and Medapati Srirama Reddy. Also, Rs.1,00,000/- was given towards adapaduchukatnam.

(ii) It is said that Ac.3.35 cents of land and a house portion was given to the Appellant/Wife at Pentapadu. It is said that the father-in-law of the Appellant/Wife was residing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top