SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Abdul Hameed Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
Kavita Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Virendra Verma, Advocate

JUDGMENT ON BOARD

Goutam Bhaduri, J.—Heard.

Present appeal is against the judgment dated 13/12/2023 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Dantewada wherein an application filed by the appellant claiming custody of their child which according to the appellant was begotten out of the relationship with non-applicant was claimed, was dismissed at the threshold.

2. The case of the appellant is that the appellant follows the muslim rituals and non-applicant is governed by the hindu law. The application would show that they were in live in relationship for three years, thereafter, in the year 2021 without conversion, they got married. According to the averments, the non-applicant/respondent was his second wife as he was married earlier and from first wife he had three children. The appellant contended that the child was born out of their relation on 31/08/2021. All of a sudden, according to the appellant on 10/08/2023, he discovered that the non-applicant along with the child is missing. Thereafter, he enquired about the whereabouts and a habeas corpus petition was filed before the High Court bearing number WPHC No.25/2023. According to the averments of the petition, the non-applicant appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top