A. S. CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN
Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke, since deceased, through her heirs & L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
Keshav Ramchandra Jadhav – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jitendra Jain, J.—In Second Appeal No.593 of 1987, the following substantial question of law arose for consideration:
“Whether a daughter could acquire any right, either limited or absolute, by inheritance prior to coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in the property of her deceased father, who died prior to 1956, leaving behind him in addition to such daughter, his widow as well?”
2. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid substantial question of law are that one Yeshwantrao had two wives, Laxmibai and Bhikubai –Yeshwantrao had two daughters from Laxmibai, namely Sonubai and Radhabai. From his marriage with Bhikubai, he had a daughter, Champubai. Laxmibai pre-deceased her husband in 1930. Sonubai expired in 1949 while Yeshwantrao expired on 10th June 1952. Bhikubai expired on 8th July 1973 after executing a will in favour of her daughter Champubai on 14th August 1956. Radhabai, the daughter from the first marriage of Yeshwantrao filed suit for declaration that she had half share in the properties left behind by her father and sought partition of the same. The trial Court dismissed the suit holding that Bhikubai alone inherited the suit properties in view o
Laxman Tukaram vs. Bendrabai Tukaram Karwate
Arshnoor Singh vs. Harpal Kaur and Ors.
Devolution of interest in coparcenary property¯Daughter would not have any right, either limited or absolute, by inheritance prior to coming into force of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in property of he....
A daughter cannot inherit property from a father who died before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, if he left behind a widow.
(1) If a property of a male Hindu dying intestate is a self-acquired property or obtained in partition of a coparcenary or a family property, same would devolve by inheritance and not by survivorship....
Daughters are ineligible to inherit under Mitakshara Law prior to 1956, affirming that property succession is limited to male heirs in such cases.
The court affirmed that under the Hindu Succession Act, daughters do not inherit coparcenary property prior to the 2005 amendment, and the plaintiff's title was upheld against the defendant's claims.
Daughters born before 1956 are entitled to coparcenary rights under the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005, irrespective of their marital status.
Daughters have equal rights in coparcenary property regardless of marriage status, and oral partitions not supported by registered documents are not recognized.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.