Pooja VS State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Pooja – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Learned Advocate
For the Respondent-State:Mr. V.S. Badakh, Learned Advocate

JUDGMENT

Appellant impugns judgment and order dated 01.12.2023, passed by Additional District Judge, Kaij, District Beed, in Civil Misc. Application No. 30 of 2023, by which appellant’s prayer under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 to grant permission to sale land of herself and her three minor children has been declined.

2. Appellant approached Additional District Judge, Kaij under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, seeking permission to sale agriculture land bearing Gut No. 478, ad-measuring 85 R, situated at village Salegaon, Tq. Kaij, District Beed, standing jointly in her name with minor children. It is contention of appellant that her husband committed suicide. He was owner of suit land. After his death, her name with three minor children have been mutated in record of rights over suit property. Appellant is working in Private Sector at Pune. Her minor children are taking education. Appellant was unable to meet education expenses of children. Land in question is situated at District Beed, therefore, it is difficult for her to cultivate the same from Pune. Approximate valuation of the land is Rs. 12,75,000/-. She wish to invest aforesai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document