P.NAVEEN RAO
Appala Ganesh Chakravarthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
P. Naveen Rao, J.
1. Extensive submissions are made by learned counsel for petitioners Sri Naresh Reddy, pointing out several illegalities in pre-election process.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners pointed out 'hat in several wards, the voters are shown without reflecting the house numbers of the voters and in many cases, the house numbers are not mentioned but plot numbers are mentioned. Several illegalities were pointed out but the same are not rectified. Learned counsel for petitioner vividly demonstrated that in several wards, there are alterations in voters lists published by the Municipality contrary to entry in the voters list drawn by Election Commission of India. He has pointed out that in several wards, house numbers are mentioned as 00', inaccurate house numbers are shown, against open plot numbers, voters names are shown. These voters were not found in the respective wards in the voters list published by Election Commission of India, and brought into these wards with an intention to influence the result of the election to concerned wards. Further, particularly with reference to ward numbers 6, 7, 8 and 19 house numbers mentioned in the documents filed along with t
Anugrah Narain Singh v. State of U.P. (1996) 6 SCC 303
Eppala China Venkateswarlu v. Secretary to Government
Lakshmi Charan Sen v. A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman (1985) 4 SCC 689
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.