IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICDATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
A. Rajasheker Reddy, J.
H. Deepika - Appellant
Versus
Mainteance Welfare of Parents And Others - Respondents
W.P. No. 5125 of 2017
Decided On : 05-03-2020
Constitution of India, Article 226 - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 – Confirmation of order passed by the Chairman, Maintenance and welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens tribunal, Karimnagar/RDO, Karimnagar Division, Dt.27.08.2016 and accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the appellant is hereby directed to comply with the orders of the Chairman, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Tribunal, Karimnagar / RDO, Karimnagar Division, Dt.27.08.2016 otherwise the necessary action will be initiated as per law – Challenged – Held, appellate authority failed to record reasons while confirming the order of the primary authority, and this amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. In normal circumstances, this court would have remanded the matter to the appellate authority to pass orders afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties and by recording cogent and convincing reasons. But having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, which are discussed above, this court found that though reasons are not recorded, the conclusion arrived at by the appellate authority, is just and proper. Further, this court is of the view that if this glaring anomaly is sought to be rectified by way of remand, it would amount to erasing the justice in the name of correcting the error of law, which this court is not inclined to undertake, having regard to the present facts and circumstances of the case – Extraordinary jurisdiction conferred on this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is discretionary in nature and even if case is made out, still the court has discretion not to entertain the writ petition – Petition dismissed (Paras 44,45 and 46)
Finding of the Court:
appellate authority failed to record reasons while confirming the order of the primary authority, and this amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. In normal circumstances, this court would have remanded the matter to the appellate authority to pass orders afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties and by recording cogent and convincing reasons. But having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, which are discussed above, this court found that though reasons are not recorded, the conclusion arrived at by the appellate authority, is just and proper. Further, this court is of the view that if this glaring anomaly is sought to be rectified by way of remand, it would amount to erasing the justice in the name of correcting the error of law, which this court is not inclined to undertake, having regard to the present facts and circumstances of the case – Extraordinary jurisdiction conferred on this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is discretionary in nature and even if case is made out, still the court has discretion not to entertain the writ petition
Result: Petition dismissed
ORDER :
Petitioner herein is the daughter-in-law of respondents 3 and 4. Respondents 3 and 4 filed application before the 2nd respondent – Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Tribunal – cum – Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, under Chapter V of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short ‘the Act’) stating that their daughter-in-law harassed them, both physically and mentally, and evicted them from one of the portions of their house, and hence requested for handing over the possession of the subject house. The 2nd respondent passed the following order vide Proceedings No.M/2639/2016 dated 27.08.2016:
It is directed to handover the house bearing H.No.8-6-119/2, Kothirampur, Karimnagar and house documents to H.Bhagya Rekha, w/o Rameshwar Rao by Smt. Deepika Krishna, w/o H.Sandeep.
As per the orders, if any violation of orders by Smt. Deepika Krishna, w/o H.Sandeep or any kind of ill-treatment made against the applicant they will be prosecuted as per Section 2(9) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
In this connection, it is directed the Tahsildar, Karimnagar and Circle Inspector of Police, I town Police Station to provide protection to smt. Bhagya Rekha, w/o Rameshwar Rao and handover the documents bearing H.No.8-6-119/2, Kothirampur, Karimnagar from Deepika Krishna, w/o H.Sandeep. It is directed that if not satisfied with this order the same can be settled before District Legal Services Authority, Karimnagar.”
Aggrieved by the above order passed by the 2nd respondent, petitioner filed appeal, before the 1st respondent – Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Appellate Tribunal, represented by its Chairman, District Collector, Karimnagar. The 1st respondent, vide proceedings No.A3/707/1/2015-16 dated 01.02.2017, passed the following order:
Challenging the above order, the petitioner, who is the daughter-in-law of respondents 3 and 4, filed the present writ petition.
2. The admitted facts on record are that the marriage of the petitio
Board of Muslim Wakfs, Rajasthan V. Radha Kishan and others
Hameedia Hardware Stores v. B. Mohan Lal Sowcar
M.Venugopal Vs. The District Magistrate – Cum – District Collector, Kanyakumari District
Sirajul Haq Khan & Ors. v. The Sunni Central Board of Waqf
State Of Orissa V. Chandra Nandi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.