RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, A.ABHISHEK REDDY
ACE-HIBC Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sana Lakshmi Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A. ABHISHEK REDDY, J.
1. The present writ appeals are filed against the common order, dated 04.06.2019, passed by a learned Single Judge, in W.P. Nos. 22896, 25132, 26824 and 27963 of 2018, whereby the learned Single Judge had allowed the writ petitions, and prohibited the Sub-Registrar, Kukatpally, from receiving the Joint Development Agreement for registration presented by the respondents i.e. M/s. Prime Properties in favor of Sri. Sidharth Infratech and Services Ltd. and M/s. ACE HIBC Ltd.
2. Aggrieved by the above referred common order, the unofficial respondents Nos. 5 to 7 in W.P. No. 25132 of 2018 i.e. M/s. Prime Properties and Sri. Sidharth Infratech and Services Ltd. have filed the following Writ Appeals, namely W.A. Nos. 493, 497, 498, 499, 500 and 508 of 2019 before this Court.
3. All the writ petitions were filed questioning the action of the official respondents, more particularly, the Sub-Registrar, Kukatpally, in receiving the Joint Development Agreement for registration presented by the respondents i.e. M/s. Prime Properties in favor of Sri. Sidharth Infr
Dubbasi Mallaiah vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Dubbasi Mallaiah vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Rambaran Prosad vs. Ram Mohid Hazra
State of A.P. vs. Audikesava Reddy
Suraj Lamp and Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Haryana
State of Gujarat vs. Manoharsinghji Pradyumansinhji Jadeja
T. Bangaru Raju vs. Authorised Officer-cum-RDO Land Reforms Tribunal
Thumati Venkaiah vs. State of A.P. (1980) 4 SCC 295
Union of India vs. Vasavi Co-operative housing Society Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.