A.ABHISHEK REDDY
D. Sudhakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.Abhishek Reddy, J. - The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the Orders of Joint Collector passed in file No.F3/5382/2007-F3/36/ROR/2007, dated 26.06.2008, whereby the learned Joint Collector has set aside the Order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy, (in short, 'R.D.O.'), in file No.A3/2385/05, dated 31.05.2007.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the writ petitioners who claim to be the legal heirs of one Sri Ranga Reddy, the original owner and pattedar of the land in Sy.No.15, admeasuring Acs.18.01 gts., situated at Osman Nagar Village, Ramachandrapur Mandal, Medak District. The said Sri Ranga Reddy was survived by a son - Hanmanth Reddy, and after the death of Hanmanth Reddy, the property devolved on the writ petitioners as well as respondents No.5 to 9. On verification of the revenue records, Sy.No.15 was sub-divided into Sy.No.15/E for an extent of Acs.5.20 gts., and the name of the respondent No.4 herein was incorporated in pattadar as well as possessor columns. The further case of the petitioners is that no notice was issued to the petitioners nor any enquiry was conducted by the M.R.O., before incorporating the name of th
A.K.Kraipak vs. Union of India
Chinnam Pandurangam vs. Mandal Revenue Officer
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.