K.LAKSHMAN
Mahenderkar Amarnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in not conducting investigation in a fair and transparent manner by considering the dying declaration in Crime No. 63 of 2016 pending on the file of Shankarampet (A) Police Station, Medak District as illegal and for a consequential direction to respondent No. 3 to investigate the said crime, arrest respondent Nos. 4 to 7 and file charge sheet/final report against them.
2. Heard Mr. Palle Sriharinath, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned Senior Counsel, representing Mr. Sridhar Lonkala, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 to 7 and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
3. FACTS:
(ii) on receipt of the said complaint, respondent No. 3 has registered a case in Crime No. 63 of 2015 under Section 174 of Cr.P.C.
(
Bhagwan Tukaram Dange vs. State of Maharashtra
Bhajju alias Karan Singh vs. State of M.P. 2012 CrLJ 3877 (SC)
Chirra Shivraj vs. State of A.P. (2010) 14 SCC 444
Dharam Pal vs. State of Haryana
Eicher Tractors Ltd. Haryana vs. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay
Govindaraju @ Govinda vs. State of Sriramapuram P.S. (2012) 4 SCC 722
Harbans Singh vs. State of Punjab
Khushal Rao vs. State of Bombay
Kishan Lal vs. Dharmendra Bafna
Kailash Chandra vs. Union of India
K. Chandrasekhar vs. State of Kerala
K. Ramachandra Reddy vs. Public Prosecutor
Kashmeri Devi vs. Delhi Administration and Another
Lallu Manjhi and Another vs. State of Jharkhand
M. Sarvana alias K.D. Saravana vs. State of Karnataka
Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat
Neetu Kumar Nagaich vs. State of Rajasthan
Ramachandran vs. R. Udhayakumar
Rubabbuddin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat
S.N. Sharma vs. Bipen Kumar Tiwari and Others
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Suresh alias Chhavan
State of M.P. vs. Vishweshwar Kol
Umakant vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Vijay Pal vs. State (NCT) of Delhi
Judicial intervention in criminal investigations is warranted to ensure fair process and public trust when local authorities are ineffective or biased.
Point of Law : Suicide or murder - Medical evidence may help the police in coming to a firm conclusion.
Point of law : To encompass two imperatives; firstly, the investigation must be unbiased, honest, just and in accordance with law; and secondly, the entire emphasis has to be to bring out the truth o....
The magistrate has no power to order further investigation suo motu or on the request of the complainant/informant after cognizance is taken and the accused person appears, nor does the magistrate ha....
The admissibility and reliability of dying declarations, the burden of proving the dying declaration lies on the prosecution, and the power of the trial court to judge its reliability and admissibili....
Point of Law : Offence of Murder - Inherit Powers of High Court - power of quashing should be exercised sparingly with circumspection, in ‘rarest of rare cases’. (The rarest of rare cases standard in....
The court upheld the investigation by the CBI and ruled that the death of the victim was a case of suicide, deprecating the repeated filing of proceedings by the petitioner for the same cause of acti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.