JUDGMENT:

Challenge in this appeal is to the Award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hyderabad, in M.V.O.P.No.2841 of 2011, dated 11.01.2016.

2. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants-claimants as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2-insurance company and gave anxious consideration to the contentions raised.

3. The limited point involved in this appeal is with regard to the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

4. In this regard, learned counsel for the appellants contended that as against the claim for Rupees Twenty five lakhs, the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.9,45,000/- only, which is highly disproportionate and therefore, it has to be enhanced.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.2-insurance company submitted that the Tribunal has taken all the aspects into consideration and awarded just amount as compensation and therefore, the same requires no interference by this Court.

6. Thus, the point that arises for consideration is Whether the amount awarded as compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hyderabad in MVOP.No.2841 of 2011 through Award dated 11.01.2016 is unjustifiable, as contended by the appell