Back
P.NAVEEN RAO, P.SREE SUDHA
Shajahan w/o. Shaik Ismail – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, General Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER :
P.Naveen Rao, J.
The Commissioner of Police & Additional District Magistrate (Executive), Hyderabad, in exercise of power under Section 3(2) of “The Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Land-Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertiliser Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Offenders, Gaming Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Explosive Substances Offenders, Arms Offenders, Cyber Crime Offenders and White Collar of Financial Offenders Act, 1986 (Act No.1 of 1986), passed orders of detention dated 26.03.2021. The Commissioner holds that the detenu has been committing series of offences of theft of cell phones and cash from the passengers travelling in sharing auto-rickshaws and theft of two wheeler vehicles in the limits of Hyderabad and Cyberabad Police Commissionerate along with his associates, in an organized manner, creating large scale fear and panic among the general public affecting the public order. The Government accorded approval to the said detention order. The Advisory Board reviewed the case on 17.05.2021 and affirmed the decision to detain. Based
If the detaining authority apprehends that since the detenu was released on bail, there would be imminent possibility of his committing similar offences, nothing prevented the detaining authority in ....
(1) Mere contravention of law such as indulging in cheating or criminal breach of trust certainly affects ‘law and order’ but before it can be said to affect ‘public order’, it must affect the commun....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exceptional nature of preventive detention, the need for subjective satisfaction by the authority, and the importance of strict compliance with....
The satisfaction of the authorities under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic offenders and Land Grab....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between law and order and public order, emphasizing that the activities must have the potential to disturb the public peace and ....
Preventive detention must be justified by a clear disturbance to public order, not merely by allegations of individual offenses.
(1) Preventive detention – Powers to be exercised under Preventive Detention Law are exceptional powers which have been given to Government for its exercise in an exceptional situation as it strikes ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that activities must have the potential to disturb public order by affecting the community or public at large to be considered prejudicial to publi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of justifying the invocation of preventive detention laws and the distinction between 'law and order' and 'public order' in determini....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
