SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 160

K.LAKSHMAN
Vontela Surender Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : IVASA RAO PUTLURI
For the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE TG

ORDER:

Heard Mr. V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned senior counsel representing Mr. V. Rohith, Mr. Surendra Desai, Mr. Srinivasa Rao Putluri and Mr. K. Venu Madhav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective petitioners, other learned counsel for the remaining petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents and Mr. G. V. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents.

2. The lis involved in this batch of writ petitions is one and the same. Therefore, they are heard together and decided by this common order.

3. The grievance of the petitioners in all these writ petitions is to declare the action of the respondent authorities, more particularly, the District Registrar and the Sub-Registrar in not entertaining the documents submitted by the petitioners for registration, and not releasing the same even after completion of registration formalities.

4. It is contended by the petitioners that the Vendors are owners of their respective extents in respective survey numbers, the details of which are specifically mentioned.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top