K.LAKSHMAN
Vontela Surender Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Mr. V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned senior counsel representing Mr. V. Rohith, Mr. Surendra Desai, Mr. Srinivasa Rao Putluri and Mr. K. Venu Madhav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective petitioners, other learned counsel for the remaining petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents and Mr. G. V. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents.
2. The lis involved in this batch of writ petitions is one and the same. Therefore, they are heard together and decided by this common order.
3. The grievance of the petitioners in all these writ petitions is to declare the action of the respondent authorities, more particularly, the District Registrar and the Sub-Registrar in not entertaining the documents submitted by the petitioners for registration, and not releasing the same even after completion of registration formalities.
4. It is contended by the petitioners that the Vendors are owners of their respective extents in respective survey numbers, the details of which are specifically mentioned.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.