Back
N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
M. Radhika Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr.Farhan Azam Khan, learned standing counsel for respondent No.5. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.
2. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the absolute owner and peaceful possessor of the subject property and due to domestic needs and dire necessary of money, the petitioner intends to sell the subject property, in this regard
The court ruled that without evidence of demand for registration and refusal, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued, emphasizing compliance with statutory duties under the Indian Registration Act.
The refusal of a Sub-Registrar to register a document must follow statutory procedures and provide reasons, as mandated by the Registration Act, 1908.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
