SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 363

A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
Khaja Azeemuddin – Appellant
Versus
Fahmina Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: MOHAMMAD ADNAN.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 16.03.2021 in I.A. No. 81 of 2021 in O.P. No. 166 of 2015 passed by the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder the application filed by the petitioner u/s.151 of CPC for recording the evidence of the petitioner through Video Conferencing was rejected.

2. As per para-3 of the affidavit, filed in support of the application, it is mentioned that in case the petitioner leaves the job, he will not be in a position to get it back or even go back to USA and he will be put to irreparable loss, as he has already spent huge amount on visiting USA. He is ready and willing to give evidence and he may be cross-examined, through Video Conferencing. This application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the Court below through the order impugned with an observation that without going into the merits of the case and the counter, as I.A. No. 170 of 2021 permitting the petitioner to be represented through Power of Attorney holder is dismissed, this application was also dismissed.

3. Notice was served on the respondent, thro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top