ORDER :

The order of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Sulthanabad, in E.P. No.2 of 2012, dated 14.12.2016 is under challenge.

2. Decree-holder to the execution petition has challenged the impugned order.

3. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and gave anxious consideration to the contents of the decisions relied upon by the learned counsel.

4. In spite of service of notice upon the respondents 2 and 3, they failed to make their appearance and submit.

5. The execution petition, which stood numbered as E.P. No.2 of 2012, was moved by the decree-holder under order XXI Rule 11 CPC seeking the Court for executing the decree that was passed in O.S. No.63 of 1999 and thereby to pull down the structures present in the suit schedule property. The judgment debtors resisted the execution petition mainly on the ground that the said execution petition (EP) is barred by limitation. Considering the stand taken by the judgment debtors, coming to a conclusion that the E.P. is barred by limitation, the executing Court dismissed the execution petition. Aggrieved by