IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G. Sri Devi, J.
Yellampalli Hanumantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 6346 of 2021
Decided On : 23-08-2021
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Petition - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A-3 based on the lack of prima facie evidence for the offence alleged and the petitioner's submission regarding land disputes and his whereabouts at the time of the incident.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner/A-3 filed a Criminal Petition for grant of anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 307 of IPC r/w. 34 of IPC, related to a plan to commit murder due to land disputes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that no injury report had been filed by the prosecution, indicating no injuries received by any of the prosecution witnesses. It concluded that prima facie, no case under Section 307 of IPC had been made out against the petitioner/A-3 and granted anticipatory bail.
Issues: The issues involved land disputes, criminal conspiracy, and the alleged offence under Section 307 of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The lack of prima facie evidence for the alleged offence and the petitioner's submission regarding land disputes and his whereabouts at the time of the incident influenced the court's decision to grant anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was allowed, and the petitioner/A-3 was granted anticipatory bail with specific terms and conditions.
ORDER :
G. Sri Devi, J.
1. This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.'), is filed by the petitioner/A-3, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No. 290 of 2021 of Khanapur (II) Police Station, Khammam District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 307 of IPC r/w. 34 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A-3 the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State and perused the record.
3. The contents of FIR states that as per the report submitted by the de facto complainant on 08.08.2021, the accused/A-1 to A-3 along with some others, hatched a plan, engaged rowdy sheeters by giving money to them and providing deadly weapons and entered into contract with them to commit murder against the de facto complainant with criminal conspiracy due to land disputes.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/A-3 submits that there are land disputes between the petitioner and the de facto complainant and there is a civil suit in O.S. No. 526 of 2018, pending on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. He further submitted that the petitioner/A-3 was at Shirdi on 08.08.2021 and hence no accusation can be attributed against the petitioner/A-3. He also submits that the petitioner/A-3 hails from a respectable family and also social worker maintaining a Goshala and that the petitioner/A-3 is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
5. Though the allegations under Section 307 of IPC have been alleged against the petitioner/A-3, but however, no injury report, whatsoever, has been filed by the prosecution stating that there are no injuries received by any of the prosecution witnesses.
6. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, it seems that prima facie, no case under Section 307 of IPC has been made out against the petitioner/A-3.
7. Thus, looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A-3.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/A-3 is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:
(2) The petitioner/A-3 shall appear before the Investigating Authorities as and when required by them for the purpose of investigation and shall also abide the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and co-operate with the investigating officer in investigating the case.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the lack of prima facie evidence for the alleged offence and other relevant circumstances presented by the petitioner.
The existence of civil disputes between the parties influenced the court's decision to grant anticipatory bail, indicating that the offense punishable under Section 307 of IPC would not prima facie a....
The absence of ingredients of a specific criminal offence and the need to balance apprehensions raised by the prosecution with the right of the accused to seek anticipatory bail.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when the allegations do not involve severe penalties, and the accused is required to cooperate with the investigation.
The gravity of the offense and the injuries suffered by the victim are crucial factors in determining the entitlement to anticipatory bail in cases involving civil disputes and allegations of organiz....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.