IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Lalitha Kanneganti, J.
Kampat Phani Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through Intelligence officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Hyderabad sub-zone - Respondents
Criminal Petitions No. 8264, 8277, 10184 of 2021 and 297 of 2022
Decided On : 22-02-2022
NDPS Act - Bail Petitions - Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8(C) read with Section 22(C), 27A, 28 and 29 - [Alprazolam Trafficking] - [Section 8(C), 22(C), 27A, 28, 29] - The court dismissed the bail petitions filed by the accused under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 8(C) read with Section 22(C), 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Fact of the Case:
The accused were involved in the trafficking of Alprazolam, a banned substance, and were intercepted by NCB officials while exchanging the contraband and money. The accused were found to be involved in the manufacturing, storing, transporting, sale, and possession of the chemical without any permission or license. The seized contraband was confirmed to contain Alprazolam and Nordazepam, both banned substances, by the CFSL report.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the NCB officials followed the procedure for conduct of search and seizure as per the NDPS Act. The court also noted that the accused failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused to them by the mixing of contraband by the NCB officials. The court held that the NCB could establish prima facie connection of the accused to the alleged crime and that the accused could not satisfy the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, thus not entitled for bail.
Issues: 1. Alleged mixing of contraband by NCB officials. 2. Conduct of panchanama within two hours. 3. Admissibility of call data as evidence. 4. Prima facie connection of the accused to the alleged crime. 5. Satisfaction of conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the NCB officials followed the procedure for conduct of search and seizure as per the NDPS Act and that the accused failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused to them by the mixing of contraband. The court also found the call data admissible as evidence, and that the NCB could establish prima facie connection of the accused to the alleged crime. The court further emphasized the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the bail petitions filed by the accused under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. as the accused could not satisfy the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for bail.
ORDER :
All these Criminal Petitions under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. are filed by the petitioners – Accused Nos. 5, 2, 3, 4 and 1 respectively in NCB F.No. 48/1/10/2021/NCB/SUB-ZONE/H;YD on the file of Intelligence Officer, NCB, Hyderabad Sub-Zone registered for the offence punishable under Section 8(C) read with Section 22(C), 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, seeking bail.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 14.08.2021, at about 13.30 hours, on receipt of reliable information that Yachamaneni Sudhakar (Accused No.1) aged about 45 years, whitish-complexioned person of Patwari Enclave, Opposite IDL Colony, Hyderabad with around 3 kgs. of Alprazolam was coming in a car bearing Registration No. AP 09 CU 7710 along with other person to sell the contraband to one Allanki Naresh (Accused No.2) for approximately Rs. 12 lakhs who will also come in a car bearing Registration No. TS 11 EC 7292 along with one other person and the exchange of contraband and money will take place near Ujwala Grand on Medak – Hyderabad Road, Gandi Maisamma, Domara Pochampally Dindigul, Medchal-Malkajgiri, at around 16.00 hours, a team of NCB, Hyderabad proceeded to the above mentioned location, secured two independent witnesses and intercepted the persons came in the above said vehicles while exchanging the bags having cash and contraband and seized 3.2 kgs. of Alprazolam, Rs.12.75 lacs cash in the presence of independent witnesses under panchanama dated 14.08.2021. Accused Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 were summoned to give their voluntary statements. During the course of investigation, search operations were conducted at the residence of Accused No.1 and M/s Shree Karthikeya Life Sciences, Balanagar and recovered 50 gms. of Alprazolam and raw material used in manufacture of Alprazolam.
Accused No.5 in his voluntary statement dated 15.08.2021 admitted that in January 2021, Accused No.1 approached him and asked to join his company M/s Shree Karthikeya Life Science to help him and till date, he paid Rs.1,10,000/- in cash. Later, he came to know that Accused No.4 is the partner of Accused No.1. Thereafter, Accused No.5 took single bed room pent house on rent basis in the same building where M/s Shree Karthikeya Life Science exists and every month they used to manufacture 5 kgs. of Alprazolam and used to deliver different persons located in Gummadidala and Dindigal and Accused No.1 requested to provide and drive Honda Amze car having Registration No. AP 09 CU 7710 for delivery of Alprazolam.
The accused confessed that they do not have any permission or license for manufacturing, storing, transporting, sale and possession of such chemical. It is submitted that Accused No.5 not only assisted Accused No.1 in transporting but also assisted in manufacturing Alprazolam. The voluntary statements of Accused Nos. 2 and 3 also corroborated the fact that sometimes, Accused No.1 used to come in Honda Amaze car having Registration No. AP 09 CU 7710 and sometimes, he used to come by auto rickshaw for supply of Alprazolam. Accused No.4 who worked in pharma companies assisted Accused No.1 in manufacturing the contraband.
It is stated that the seized contraband was produced before the Hon’ble XXI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal on 19.08.2021 and samples were drawn in her presence and they were sent to CFSL, Hyderabad for chemical analysis. The CFSL report dated 22.11.2021 confirmed the presence of Alprazolam and Nordazepam (both are banned substances) in the seized contraband.
3. Crl.P.No. 297 of 2022 (Accused No.1):
Sri P. Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for Accused No.1 submits that it is alleged that approximately 3.25 kgs. of Alprazolam was seized. He submits that Alprazolam is not a contraband and the same is a medicine enlisted in Schedule H1 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act. He submits that the respond
AI
The stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail and the admissibility of call data as evidence.
The court held that the provisions of the NDPS Act apply alongside the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires clear grounds for believing the accused is not guilt....
Point of Law : Before the Court grants bail to an accused allegedly involved in an offence under the NDPS Act, the Court required to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty of the offence and tha....
The admissibility of recoveries made based on an accused person's disclosures, compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, and the relevance of electronic evidence such as WhatsApp ch....
The court ruled that serious charges under the NDPS Act warranted the application of strict bail conditions, emphasizing the organized nature of the alleged narcotics trafficking and concerns regardi....
The stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act and the need for substantial probable causes to grant bail.
Before the Court grants bail to an accused allegedly involved in an offence under the NDPS Act, the Court required to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty of the offence and that he will not i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.