K. LAKSHMAN
Venkateshwara Developers, rep. by its Managing Partners, Mr. Anumula Srujan & Mr. Chilukamarri Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Arepally Jeevan Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
1. If an error emanate from non-adherence of the procedure (or the rule), the life of the litigation will become complex. While passing orders, lower judiciary should take a note that their application of judicious mind at the right time, in a right way, will ease the load on higher judiciary. The present case is a class example.
PART - ‘A’
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THIS COURT:-
(a) FACTUAL BACKGROUND:-
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article - 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the Order passed in C.F.R.No.2540 of 2021 dated 21-12-2021 and C.F.R.No.2490 of 2021 dated 03-01- 2022 by the learned District Judge, Adilabad.
2. Heard Sri Naresh Reddy Chinnolla, learned counsel for the petitioner.
i) SUIT INSTITUTED:-
3. The petitioner herein had filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale and for possession. The suit schedule property is land admeasuring Acs.02-16 guntas in Sy.No.114 (after mutation in the name of the defendant, it is separately identified as Sy.No.114/A, in Revenue records and after introduction of Dharani Portal by the Government of Telangana State, the suit land is again identified by separate survey number as Sy.No.114/A7), situated a
Bolla V.K. Radha Krishna v. Viswanadha Venkata Subbaiah
P. Surendran v. State by Inspector of police
Kanakala Venkata Rao v. Konda Krishnam Raju
Hiranand Ramsook Firm v. Province of Madras
Asmal Khan v. Mohd. Abdul Ghani Sahib
Dr. V. Rajeshwar Rao v. N. Yadagiri Reddy
Krishna Pratapa Rao vs. M. Pochaiah
Viraj Constructions v. P. Pandu
It is the settled position that the relief of injunction under Section 26(c) of the Act has to be valued on the basis of the advantage sought to be derived or the loss to be averted by the plaintiff.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the correct payment of court fee in a suit must be determined in accordance with settled legal principles and the specific provisions of the C....
plaintiff filed the suit for declaration that the sale deeds were fabricated and therefore, were void. Considering the provisions of Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, it was held that sui....
The court clarified that a non-executant must pay ad valorem court fees for declaring a sale deed void, capped at Rs.1,50,000 under the Madhya Pradesh Amendment.
Interim Application - Contract for sale - Court-fee value and jurisdictional value to be same in certain suits - When there is a reasonable doubt with respect to quantum of court fees, the benefit mu....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the valuation of court fee in a partition suit is based on the market value of the property or a specified amount, and the plaintiff's alle....
In suits for declaratory decrees with consequential relief, fixed court fees apply when no possession is sought, as per Section 7(iv)(a) of the Court Fees Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.