P. NAVEEN RAO, G. RADHA RANI
Pepsi Co Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Magfast Beverages – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claim of trademark rights (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. defendants' claims and defenses (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. issues framed for consideration (Para 12 , 13 , 16) |
| 5. plaintiffs' arguments against the trial court (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court's evaluation of trademark registration (Para 22 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. legal standards for trademark infringement (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. firm standing of the ipab on trademark issues (Para 34 , 36 , 38) |
| 9. entitlement to injunction and damages (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 10. conclusion and judgment set aside (Para 94 , 95) |
JUDGMENT :
G. Radha Rani, J.
Since common issues arise in all these appeals, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. CCCA No.20 of 2021 was filed by PepsiCo against the judgment and decree in O.S No.95 of 2004 passed by the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 31.12.2019 for dismissing the suit filed by them for infringement of trade mark, copy ri
M/s.Prestige Lights Limited vs. State Bank of India
Mind Gym Limited vs. Mindgym Kids Library Private Limited
Milmet Oftho Indistries vs. Allergan Incorporation
Neon Laboratories Limited vs. Medical Technologies Limited
Nandhini Deluxe vs. Karnataka Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited
Nandhini Deluxe vs. Karnataka Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited
Patel Field Marshal Agencies v. PM Diesels Ltd.
Puneet Industrial Controls (P) vs. Aditya Enterprises Private Limited
Playboy Enterprises Inc. vs. Bharat Malik and Another
Ruston & Hornsby Limited vs. The Zamindara Engineering Company
S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath
T.Bheem Reddy and Others vs. P.Laxmi Bai and Others
Vishnudas Trading vs. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Company Limited and Another
Anant Construction Private Limited vs. Ram Niwas
Bhanu Kumar Jain vs. Archana Kumar
Corn Products Refining Company vs. Shangrila Food Products Limited
Dalip Chand Aggarwal & Others vs. M/s.Escorts Limited, New Delhi
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar vs. Mohammad Haji Lathif
Indian shaving Products Limited vs. Gift Pack
KD Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs. Navaratna Pharmaceuticals Laboratories
Registered trademark owners are entitled to prevent unauthorized use that is likely to confuse consumers, establishing a right to seek injunction and damages for infringement and passing off.
Generic and descriptive terms in trademarks cannot be exclusively claimed, and likelihood of confusion must be assessed holistically from the average consumer's perspective.
The principle of prior user of a trademark prevails over subsequent registrations, especially when confusion or association is likely between goods and services of similar trade sectors.
The use of the mark 'SUPER POSTMAN' by defendants was found to infringe the plaintiff's rights in the 'POSTMAN' mark due to deceptive similarity and ongoing goodwill of the plaintiff's trademark desp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.