SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 504

P. NAVEEN RAO, G. RADHA RANI
Pepsi Co Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Magfast Beverages – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sri K. Vivek Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Sri T.G. Rajesh Kumar.
For the Respondents: Sri Sunil B. Ganu Senior Counsel

Table of Content
1. common issues in appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. plaintiffs' claim of trademark rights (Para 6 , 7)
3. defendants' claims and defenses (Para 10 , 11)
4. issues framed for consideration (Para 12 , 13 , 16)
5. plaintiffs' arguments against the trial court (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. court's evaluation of trademark registration (Para 22 , 24 , 26 , 27)
7. legal standards for trademark infringement (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
8. firm standing of the ipab on trademark issues (Para 34 , 36 , 38)
9. entitlement to injunction and damages (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
10. conclusion and judgment set aside (Para 94 , 95)

JUDGMENT :

G. Radha Rani, J.

Since common issues arise in all these appeals, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. CCCA No.20 of 2021 was filed by PepsiCo against the judgment and decree in O.S No.95 of 2004 passed by the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 31.12.2019 for dismissing the suit filed by them for infringement of trade mark, copy ri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top