P. NAVEEN RAO
A. Parandhama Reddy S/o A. Varadha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Shivani Shivatmika Movies – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff and learned counsel for respondent/defendant no. 1.
2. Parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit. Plaintiff filed suit praying to grant decree to pay Rs. 87,10,000/- along with interest @ 24% per annum by the defendant no. 1, to restrain the first defendant from alienating the rights of Telugu movie “SEKHAR” and to restrain defendant nos. 11 to 13 from screening the Telugu Talkie picture “SEKHAR.” Along with the suit, plaintiff filed three Interlocutory Applications i.e. 874 to 876 of 2022 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC) praying to restrain defendants 11 to 13 from Telecasting/Transmitting the movie “SEKHAR” to restrain defendant no. 1 from alienating the Digital and Satellite rights to defendants 2 to 10 and to direct defendant no. 1 to deposit an amount of Rs. 87,10,000/- failing which to attach picture negative of the movie, respectively in three IAs. In I.A. No. 876 of 2022, the Court below asked the defendant no. 1 to show-cause why order of attachment before judgment should not be passed. Notice was served in the said I.A. but defendant did not choose to furnish
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.