SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 448

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J.
P. Srinivasa Rao S/o Late Shri P. Kotaiah – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana and Another – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 21647 of 2017
Decided On : 08-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Rama Subba Rao.

The government has a duty to create promotional avenues in public service to avoid stagnation and discontentment among employees.

Headnote:

PROMOTION - A.P. INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION SERVICE RULES - AMENDMENT - PROMOTIONAL CHANNEL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS WORKING IN DISTRICT INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION OFFICER OFFICES - CREATION - DELAY IN CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL - WRIT PETITION - DIRECTIONS TO GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS - ISSUED.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an Administrative Officer working in the District Intermediate Education Officer (DIEO) office, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the government to consider and pass appropriate orders on a proposal submitted by the Commissioner of Intermediate Education (CIE) for the creation of a promotional channel for Administrative Officers working in DIEO offices.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was discharging similar duties as Administrative Officers working in the office of Regional Joint Directors and that there was no promotional channel available for Administrative Officers working in DIEO offices, leading to stagnation in the post.

Issues: 1. Whether the government's delay in considering the proposal for the creation of a promotional channel for Administrative Officers working in DIEO offices was arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction from the court to the government to consider and pass appropriate orders on the proposal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on several Supreme Court judgments emphasizing the need for promotional avenues in public service to avoid stagnation and discontentment among employees. It held that the petitioner could not be discriminated against for promotion as he was in the same cadre and discharging the same duties as Administrative Officers working in the office of Regional Joint Directors.

Final Decision: The court directed the government to consider the proposal submitted by the CIE for the creation of a promotional channel for Administrative Officers working in DIEO offices and pass appropriate orders by assigning reasons, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

ORDER :

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief:

    “......to declare the action of the respondent No. 1 in not taking any decision on the proposal submitted by the respondent No. 2 vide Lr. Rc. No. Ser.II-1/2259/2009, dated 18.11.2016 for amending the A.P. Intermediate Education Service Rules issued in G.O.Ms. No. 302 (IE.I) Department, dated 30.12.1993 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 1 to take appropriate decision on the proposal submitted by the respondent No. 2 forthwith.”

2. Heard Sri K. Rama Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home for respondent no. 1 and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent no. 2.

3. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Typist in the year 1990 by way of direct recruitment through Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission and his services were regularized and was promoted as Senior Assistant in the year 1997. Subsequently, the petitioner was promoted as Superintendent in the year 2008 and thereafter, got promotion as Administrative Officer in the year 2013.

4. That the post of Administrative Officer is governed by category 6 of A.P. Intermediate Education Service Rules, 1993 and the said posts exist in the offices of Regional Joint Directors and District Intermediate Education Officers (for short ‘DIEO’) in the districts. It is averred that the promotional channel is created only for the Administrative Officers working in Regional Joint Directors in the Zones and there is no channel of promotion for the Administrative Officers working in the DIEO Offices.

5. The petitioner submitted a representation on 11.05.2016 to the Government through its Association seeking appropriate amendments to the A.P. Intermediate Service Rules to create promotion channel for A.Os for promotion at the offices of DIEO/Deputy Director (Admn). Accordingly, respondent No. 1 sought for a detailed report vide its Memo No. 3434/IE/A1/2016 dated 03.06.2016 from the respondent No. 2. The respondent No. 2 submitted proposal to the respondent No. 1 vide Lr. Rc. No. Ser.II-1/2259/2009, dated 18.11.2016 for amendment of A.P. Intermediate Education Service Rules. However, the respondent No. 1 has not taken any decision on the said proposal.

6. The respondent No. 2 filed counter and did not dispute the factual aspects. In paragraph No. 7 of counter it is specifically stated that no promotion channel is available for the post of Administrative Officer working in office of the District Vocational Education Officer, which is now designated as District Intermediate Education Officer. Hence, there was stagnation in the post of Administrative Officer in the Districts.

7. In paragraph No. 8 of the counter, respondent No. 2 further stated that:

    “8. The non-teaching staff Associations also represented to rectify this anomaly. Hence, after examining the matter, proposals have been furnished to Government vide CIE's Letter, dated 18.11.2016 for creation of promotion channel for the post of Administrative Officer working in O/o District Intermediate Education Officer to the post of Deputy Director (Admin) in O/o C.I.E.T.S. Hyderabad, duly Incorporating a clause of passing of the Departmental tests (a) Accounts Test for Sub-ordinate Officers Part-1 and 11, or Accounts Test for Executive Officers for the post of Administrative Officer/Dy. D.V.E.O and to make necessary amendment to Intermediate Education Service Rules issued in G.O.Ms. No. 302, Education Department, dated 30.12.1993.”

8. The respondent No. 2 further contended that a letter dated 18.11.2016 was sent for creation of promotion channel for the post of Administrative Officer working in the DIEO to the post of Deputy Director (Admn.) duly incorporating a clause of passing of the Departmental tests (a) Accounts Test for Sub-ordinate Officers Part-I and II, or Accounts Test for Executive Officer

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top