K. SARATH
Yellanki Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In all these petitions, the petitioners are questioning the conditions imposed under A.P Grameena Vikas Bank Regularization Scheme of Casual/Daily Wage workers as Office Attendants (Multipurpose) in Group-C, 2023 vide Circular No.APGVB/Per&HRD/75/2022-23 dated 13.02.2023 viz., Regulation 2 (2), 3 and 7 (i) insisting for a written online test, prescribing outer age limit of 28 years at the time of initial engagement and applying the scheme only to the Casual/Daily Wage workers who have worked for ten years or more service as on 31.12.2017 instead of 13.02.2023 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. In view of the same, all these petitions were heard together and being disposed of by way of common order.
2. Head Sri Prathap Narayan Sanghi, Learned Senior Counsel and Smt. P.K.Kalyani, Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri V.R.Avula, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that all the writ petitioners are employees of the respondent No.3-Bank and most of them are continuously in service for the past more than 10-15 years and at leas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.