Back
K. SARATH
Yellanki Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In all these petitions, the petitioners are questioning the conditions imposed under A.P Grameena Vikas Bank Regularization Scheme of Casual/Daily Wage workers as Office Attendants (Multipurpose) in Group-C, 2023 vide Circular No.APGVB/Per&HRD/75/2022-23 dated 13.02.2023 viz., Regulation 2 (2), 3 and 7 (i) insisting for a written online test, prescribing outer age limit of 28 years at the time of initial engagement and applying the scheme only to the Casual/Daily Wage workers who have worked for ten years or more service as on 31.12.2017 instead of 13.02.2023 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. In view of the same, all these petitions were heard together and being disposed of by way of common order.
2. Head Sri Prathap Narayan Sanghi, Learned Senior Counsel and Smt. P.K.Kalyani, Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri V.R.Avula, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that all the writ petitioners are employees of the respondent No.3-Bank and most of them are continuously in service for the past more than 10-15 years and at leas
The court held that the conditions imposed by the respondent bank were illegal and arbitrary, and were contrary to the directions issued by the court in earlier orders. The court also held that the r....
The court ruled that prolonged engagement of casual workers without regularization violates fair employment standards, directing a scheme for regularization based on service length and suitability.
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
Regularization of daily-wage or casual employees is not an automatic right upon completing 240 days of service. It remains contingent upon the availability of sanctioned posts and adherence to govern....
Temporary employees are entitled to regularization from their initial engagement date, ensuring fair treatment and notional fixation of pay, but not to arrears of pay.
The court established that employees cannot claim regularization unless they are working against sanctioned posts, as per the Jharkhand Regularization Rules of 2015 and 2019.
Appointments not being sponsored by the employment exchange, as prescribed under Rule 149(2) of the Rules, would only make the appointments irregular and not illegal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
