IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Mohammed Akif Safvan- Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana and others - Respondents
W.P.No. 38834 of 2022
Decided On : 18-07-2023
Writ Petition - Constitution of Managing Committee - Waqf Act, 1995, Andhra Pradesh Waqf Managing Committee (Constitution, Functions and Duties) Regulations, 2009 - Section 18 of Waqf Act, 1995, Regulation 5 of Andhra Pradesh Wakfs Managing Committee - The court discussed the appointment of the managing committee for a registered Waqf institution and the violation of regulations in the appointment process. It highlighted the necessity for the Board to establish committees for the supervision of Waqfs and the method of constitution of the managing committee as per the regulations. The court emphasized the importance of following due process of law and the Board's independent application of mind in appointing the committee.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a regular mussalli at a registered Waqf institution, challenged the appointment of the managing committee by the Telangana State Waqf Board, citing illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional actions that violated the Waqf Act, 1995 and Andhra Pradesh Waqf Managing Committee (Constitution, Functions and Duties) Regulations, 2009.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of the managing committee did not follow the due process of law and was influenced by political recommendations, leading to an illegal and arbitrary decision. It held that the petitioner had the locus to file the writ petition and that the appointment was made under political influence, destroying its credibility.
Issues: The issues revolved around the legality and due process of the appointment of the managing committee for the Waqf institution, the influence of political recommendations, and the violation of regulations in the appointment process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the violation of Regulation 5 of Andhra Pradesh Wakfs Managing Committee (Constitution, Functions and Duties) Regulations, 2009, and the necessity for the Board to establish committees for the supervision of Waqfs as per Section 18 of Waqf Act, 1995. It emphasized the importance of the Board's independent application of mind and the exclusion of jurisdiction by availability of alternative remedy.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned proceedings and directing the 3rd Respondent to initiate steps to appoint a new committee within a specified period, in accordance with the regulations. It also directed the respondent Waqf Board to take direct control of the Waqf institution until the new committee is appointed.
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home, learned Government Pleader for Minorities and Mr Abu Akram, learned standing counsel for the 3rd respondent – waqf board.
2. This writ petition is filed to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing F.No.07/HYD/C/2018/Z-1, dated 06.08.2022 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Telangana State Waqf Board as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, infringing of petitioners fundamental and legal rights apart from violative of Waqf Act, 1995, Andhra Pradesh Waqf Managing Committee (Constitution, Functions and Duties) Regulations,2009, action of the respondents in constituting the committee through impugned proceedings is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
b) H.No.11-3-912 is the Jamia Masjid, Mallepally, Hyderabad which is a registered and notified waqf property, and the same is published in A.P Gazette No.32-A, dated 30.08.1984 at Pages No.24 and 25 at Sl.No. 1772 covering an extent of 1470 Sq.Yrds., its attached properties are a house, three mulgies, tin shed and open land admeasuring 8200 Sq.Yds., bearing Municipal Nos.11-3-913/1 to 916/1, situated at Mouzzampura, Mallepally, Hyderabad.
c) The petitioner applied for the copy of Muntakab, Gazette and other documents i.e. the (a) Proceedings, dated 28.02.2018, (b) Boards Resolution No.1209, dt.22.06.2021, (c) Representation dated 17.01.2022, (d) Note orders of Hon'ble Chairperson, Telangana State Wakf Board, Hyderabad, (e) Boards Resolution No.26, dt.23.07.2022 and Orders of the Hon'ble Chairperson, Telangana State Wakf Board, Hyderabad but they were not made available to the petitioner except the proceedings bearing F.No.07/HYD/C/2018/Z-1, 06.08.2022 through RTI Act issued by Chief Executive Officer, Telangana State Wakf Board, Hyderabad.
d) The Mosque is being managed by the Committee from a long time, but the Management of the earlier committees were not up to the mark, the Mussalies of the Mosque, the Wakf Institution was suffering a lot due to inbuilt politics, hidden agendas of the office bearers, which were brought into the notice of respondents herein, but nothing concrete was done to avoid making the Wakf Institution and Musallies to suffer.
e) The Managing committee was constituted for a period of (3) years under Section 18 of Wakf Act, 1995 through Proceedings bearing F.No.07/HYD/C/2018/2-1, dated 28.02.2018 under the Presidentship of Mr. Mohammed Abdul Jabbar accompanied by (8) office bearers, whose term came to an end on 27.01.2021.
f) After expiry of the earlier committee, a new committee was appointed unanimously by the Board's Resolution and Mr. Gulam Ahmed Pasha was appointed as President of the Committee accompanied by (10) other office bearers. It's so happened, the few members of the committee resigned from the office and a vacuum was created. The Wakf Board without any powers included (3) new names of the persons in the Committee, which resulted in filing of a Writ Petition bearing W.P No.9431 of 2018, and the High Court passed an Interim Order by deleting added names and the said Writ Petition is still pending adjudication. The term of the committee came to an end after (2) years.
g) That being so, the petitioner filed a representation on 20.06.2020 addressing respondent No.3, requesting the office to consider the names of locality people, who are residents of Mozzampura, Mallepally, Hyderabad, because earlier the committee members were non-residents of Mozzampura, Mallepally, Hyderabad and the supervision was not proper and appropriate due to numerous reasons, in which the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fair panels and the mandatory election process under Section 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Wakfs Managing Committee Regulations, 200....
The Waqf Board acted without jurisdiction in recalling the managing committee's appointment, violating statutory procedures and principles of natural justice.
The Chairman of the Waqf Board has the authority to appoint a new Management Committee post supersession based on the provisions of the Waqf Act.
Appointment of Waqf managing committees must comply with statutory regulations, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice and election procedures when multiple applications exist.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for fair enquiry and proper procedure before removing office bearers, as mandated by the Wakf Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.