Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Suryodaya Infra Projects (I) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the substantive case facts (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions of the parties regarding obligations (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning related to jurisdiction and remedies (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final dismissal of the writ petition with no merit (Para 14 , 24) |
| 5. critical examination of alternative remedies and legal rights (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
Heard Dr Anurag Kumar Agarwal, Senior counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Pasham Mohit, Learned Counsel representing the petitioner, Mr. Damodar Mundra, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3. Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deputy Solicitor General of India, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and Sri R.Raghava Chary, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actions of the 2nd Respondent in releasing and making payments to the 3rd Respondent in spite of being aware of the actions of the 3rd Respondent in not making payments to the Petitioner, i.e. the authorized subcontractor contrary to the terms of the Work Order dated 06.12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
