SUREPALLI NANDA
Suryodaya Infra Projects (I) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Dr Anurag Kumar Agarwal, Senior counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Pasham Mohit, Learned Counsel representing the petitioner, Mr. Damodar Mundra, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3. Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deputy Solicitor General of India, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and Sri R.Raghava Chary, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actions of the 2nd Respondent in releasing and making payments to the 3rd Respondent in spite of being aware of the actions of the 3rd Respondent in not making payments to the Petitioner, i.e. the authorized subcontractor contrary to the terms of the Work Order dated 06.12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to make payments to the tune of IN 2,90,00,000/- to the Petitioner directly towards the outstanding amounts under the Work Order dated 06.12.2018 arising out of Contract dated 10.11.2016 vide Agreement No. ED/(E&P)/ SP-III/RWLS/PKG-10/132.
3. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
C.V. Rao & Ors v. Strategic Port Investment
Lanco Infratech Ltd. v. HCC Ltd. (2016) 234 DLT 175
M/s. Radhakrishan Industries vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Oil & Natural Gas Commission Vs. Utpal Kumar Vasu & Others
Ramantech & Proceess Engineering Company & Another Vs. Solanki Traders
Rite Approach Group Ltd. v. Rosoboronexport
Satyapal Anand Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Silppi Constructions Contractors vs. Union of India & Another
State of Bihar vs. Jain Plastics & Chemicals Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.