SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 717

K. SARATH
Anup K. Kotapalli – Appellant
Versus
Pannala Malla Reddy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Kumar Heroor, Advocate, H.Sudhakara Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Since both these revisions arise out of same suit for the common issue, they are being disposed of by this common order.

3. The C.R.P.No.2120 of 2021 is filed against the order dtd. 7/12/2021 in I.A.No.675 of 2021 in O.S.No.74 of 2021 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District, wherein the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) C.P.C. read with Sec. 151 C.P.C. was dismissed.

4. The C.R.P.No.970 of 2022 is filed against the order dtd. 7/12/2021 in I.A.No.884 of 2021 in O.S.No.74 of 2021 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District, wherein the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. read with Sec. 151 C.P.C., was dismissed.

5. The case of the petitioners/defendant Nos.2 and 3 in C.R.P.No.2120 of 2021 is that they are absolute owners and possessors of suit agricultural land admeasuring Ac:10-00 gts in Sy.No.390/AA and 390/EE situated at Kotepally Village and Mandal, Vikarabad having purchased the same through registered sale deed dtd. 14/2/2013 and after purchase, their names were mutated in the revenue records. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top