SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 164

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, JJ.
Sri Avantika Contractors (I) Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST) and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 8405 of 2023
Decided On : 06-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri C.V. Narasimham.
For the Respondents: Sri Dominic Fernandes, Senior Standing Counsel, Ms. Shireen Sethna Baria.

The court ruled that GST does not apply to services executed outside India's territory, affirming that the taxpayer's activities in Maldives constituted a fixed establishment subject to local laws.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Goods and Services Tax (GST) - Advance Ruling - The petitioner challenged the Order-in-Appeal affirming an advance ruling against the applicability of GST for construction services provided in Maldives, arguing that such services should be treated as 'zero rated supplies' due to execution outside India. (Paras 3-11)

(B) Fixed Establishment - The court differentiated between the registered office in India and the operational establishment in Maldives, emphasizing that the GST law applies based on where the service is actually performed, and established that the petitioner had a fixed establishment in Maldives. (Paras 12-44)

(C) Location of Supply - The court referenced various GST provisions regarding the definition of 'location of supplier' and 'recipient' concluding that the GST law does not apply since services were rendered outside India. (Paras 45-69)

(D) Final ruling - The appellate authority's interpretation was erroneous; the court ruled the contract performance occurred in the Maldives, leading to the reimbursement of GST. (Paras 70-74)

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. existence of mou for construction (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claim of zero rate supplies under gst (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal arguments on applicability of gst (Para 7 , 13 , 14 , 25)
4. indications of potential tax reimbursement (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 21)
5. provision of service and establishment definition are crucial for gst determination. (Para 10 , 24)
6. establishment of principal legal relationships (Para 31 , 34 , 46)
7. judicial interpretation of fixed establishment (Para 32 , 33 , 39 , 64)
8. re-registration does not create separate entity (Para 42 , 43 , 45)
9. reimbursement obligation due to ruling (Para 71 , 72 , 73)

ORDER :

Sujoy Paul, J.

This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution impugns the Order-in-Appeal (OIA) No.AAAR/04/2022 dated 16.07.2022, whereby the view of the Advance Ruling Authority dated 05.08.2021 (Annexure P-18) was affirmed.

Petitioner’s case:-

2. The Government of India (GoI) entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Government of Maldives for constructing a Police Academy funded by the GoI. In turn, the GoI appointed respondent No.2 i.e., National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., (NBCCL) to execute the construction of Police Academy by itself or through a contractor. NBCCL awarded contract to the petitioner.

3. In order to complete the work at Republic of Maldives (Maldives), the NBCCL set up an office and in turn the petitioner also set up their office at Addu city, Maldives. The Authorized Dealer Bank {Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC)}, which is acting on behalf of Reserve Bank of India approved the establishment of branch office of petitioner in Maldives.

4. The stand of the petitioner is that it exported various goods to its Maldives office. The turnover of such goods was declared under the GST as ‘zero rate supplies’. The petitioner treated the consideration received towards ‘works contract service of construction’ which was completely executed in the territory of Maldives through their Maldives establishment as outside the scope of GST laws of India. Respondent No.2 did not pay GST on the construction to the petitioner and also opined that supplies rendered outside India are beyond the purview of GST.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on agreement dated 08.07.2016 (Annexure P-5) to show that NBCCL has awarded contract to the petitioner for setting up of the Institute of Security and Law Enforcement Studies (ISLES) at Addu city, Maldives. Clause 1.1 of the said agreement clearly shows that construction was to be carried out in Addu city, Maldives. The Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, issued certificate dated 14.07.2016 (Annexure P-7), which makes it clear that NBCCL working under the aegis of Ministry of Urban Development has been appointed by the Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, as ‘Executing Agency’ for construction of ISLES at Addu city, Maldives. The petitioner has been duly awarded contract by NBCCL on behalf of Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, for implementation of said project. In turn, the petitioner got ‘Certificate of Re-registration’ dated 22.02.2017 (Annexure P-8), which was issued by the Registrar of Companies, Ministry of Economic Development, Republic of Maldives. The petitioner also entered into a rental agreement in order to have a ‘fixed establishment’ in Maldives. The petitioner during the time of construction of said building got employment approval from the Maldives Government in Addu city for its number of employees. Few of such documents are also placed on record as Annexure P-9.

6. Much emphasis is laid on the agreement of petitioner with Ministry of Economic Development, Republic of Maldives dated 18.04.2017 (Annexure P-10). The petitioner got itself registered under Maldivian GST Law and notification dated 19.02.2020 (Annexure P-11) was issued. A letter dated 27.12.2017 (Annexure P-13) is relied upon to submit that the OBC informed the petitioner that consideration for proje

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top