SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 303

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, JJ.
Sri Avantika Contractors (I) Limited. - Petitioner
Versus
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST) and others. - Respondents
WRIT PETITION No.8405 of 2023
Decided On : 06-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri C. V. Narasimham.
For the Respondents: Sri Dominic Fernandes, Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, Ms. Shireen Sethna Baria.

The court ruled that GST does not apply to services executed outside India, affirming that a fixed establishment in another country qualifies for favorable tax treatment under Indian law.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - IGST Act, 2017 - Advance Ruling - Petitioner contested an Advance Ruling that affirmed non-taxability of construction services provided in Maldives, stating GST laws do not extend beyond India, with reliance on statutory definitions regarding fixed establishments and locations. (Paras 11, 18, 38)

(B) Taxation - Establishment of a fixed establishment in the foreign territory does not alter the original company's status; GST laws apply based on the location of supply and recipient as per statutory provisions, specifically Sections 2 (7), 12 and 13 of the IGST Act. The court finds that the authority erred in the interpretation of key definitions and provisions of the law affecting tax obligations on services rendered outside India. (Paras 28, 41, 70)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was contracted by NBCCL to construct a Police Academy in Maldives, asserting that their operations there should be treated as outside the purview of Indian GST laws due to the foreign execution of the contract under the MoU between the Governments. The petitioner claimed its office in Maldives constituted a fixed establishment and should be recognized under Indian law for tax purposes. (Paras 2-4, 11)

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the petitioner held a fixed establishment in Maldives, thus the work performed was outside Indian territorial jurisdiction for GST purposes; confirmed that the petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of GST paid. The court reversed the previous authority's rulings, outlining deficiencies in legal interpretations by the revenue's counsel. (Paras 73-74)

Issues: The court addressed the question of whether services rendered by the petitioner in Maldives are subject to Indian GST laws based on the correct interpretation of fixed establishments and the geographical application of the IGST Act. The statute's intent concerning tax applicability for services executed outside India was central to the deliberation. (Paras 32, 60-62)

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that definitions of fixed establishment relate specifically to the nature and location of establishments legally recognized under an entity's primary jurisdiction. The ruling emphasized the necessity for consistent application of law in accordance with statutes concerning GST on services conducted in foreign territories. The conclusion drawn was that statutory definitions were misapplied in relation to the petitioner’s rights under the GST regime. (Paras 41, 52, 60)

Result: Writ Petition allowed, orders of the advance ruling and OIA set aside. Respondents mandated to reimburse GST amount to the petitioner regarding services rendered in Maldives within 90 days.

Table of Content
1. challenge regarding jurisdiction of indian gst laws applied outside india. (Para 1)
2. contract details of isles construction project. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments on gst applicability and contracts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. details about the definitions of supplier and recipient in the context of the igst act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. overview of taxation principles and establishment. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 38 , 41)
6. interpretation of statutory provisions of gst. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 65)
7. order for reimbursement of gst to petitioner. (Para 73 , 74)

ORDER :

(Sujoy Paul, J.) :

This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution impugns the Order-in-Appeal (OIA) No.AAAR/04/2022 dated 16.07.2022, whereby the view of the Advance Ruling Authority dated 05.08.2021 (Annexure P-18) was affirmed.

Petitioner’s case:-

2. The Government of India (GoI) entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Government of Maldives for constructing a Police Academy funded by the GoI. In turn, the GoI appointed respondent No.2 i.e., National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., (NBCCL) to execute the construction of Police Academy by itself or through a contractor. NBCCL awarded contract to the petitioner.

3. In order to complete the work at Republic of Maldives (Maldives), the NBCCL set up an office and in turn the petitioner also set up their office at Addu city, Maldives. The Authorized Dealer Bank {Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC)}, which is acting on behalf of Reserve Bank of India approved the establishment of branch office of petitioner in Maldives.

4. The stand of the petitioner is that it exported various goods to its Maldives office. The turnover of such goods was declared under the GST as ‘zero rate supplies’. The petitioner treated the consideration received towards ‘works contract service of construction’ which was completely executed in the territory of Maldives through their Maldives establishment as outside the scope of GST laws of India. Respondent No.2 did not pay GST on the construction to the petitioner and also opined that supplies rendered outside India are beyond the purview of GST.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on agreement dated 08.07.2016 (Annexure P-5) to show that NBCCL has awarded contract to the petitioner for setting up of the Institute of Security and Law Enforcement Studies (ISLES) at Addu city, Maldives. Clause 1.1 of the said agreement clearly shows that construction was to be carried out in Addu city, Maldives. The Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, issued certificate dated 14.07.2016 (Annexure P-7), which makes it clear that NBCCL working under the aegis of Ministry of Urban Development has been appointed by the Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, as ‘Executing Agency’ for construction of ISLES at Addu city, Maldives. The petitioner has been duly awarded contract by NBCCL on behalf of Ministry of External Affairs, GoI, New Delhi, for implementation of said project. In turn, the petitioner got ‘Certificate of Re-registration’ dated 22.02.2017 (Annexure P-8), which was issued by the Registrar of Companies, Ministry of Economic Development, Republic of Maldives. The petitioner also entered into a rental agreement in order to have a ‘fixed establishment’ in Maldives. The petitioner during the time of construction of said building got employment approval from the Maldives Government in Addu city for its number of employees. Few of such documents are also placed on record as Annexure P-9.

6. Much emphasis is laid on the agreement of petitioner with Ministry of Economic Development, Republic of Maldives dated 18.04.2017 (Annexure P-10). The petitioner got itself registered under Maldivian GST Law and notification dated 19.02.2020 (Annexure P-11) was issued. A letter dated 27.12.2017 (Annexure P-13) is relied upon to submit that the OBC informed the petitioner that consideration for project will be paid by NBCCL in Indian rupees agai

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top