IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J.
M/s. Sai Security Services Pvt Ltd - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 6053 of 2024
Decided On : 19-08-2024
Natural Justice - Termination of Contract - Article 14, Tender Conditions - The court discussed the principles of natural justice and the legal framework surrounding tender processes, emphasizing the need for compliance with tender conditions and the public interest in contract awards.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition was filed against the termination of services of the petitioners by the respondent without a show cause notice, following a tender process where the petitioner was awarded a contract despite being L3, leading to allegations of procedural lapses.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the tender process was improperly conducted, with serious lapses in awarding the contract to the petitioner, and upheld the decision to terminate the contract in favor of the rightful L1 bidder, emphasizing public interest.
Issues: Whether the termination of the petitioner's contract was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice, and whether the tender process was conducted in accordance with the prescribed conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that compliance with tender conditions is crucial, and the principles of natural justice do not apply rigidly in commercial transactions, especially when public interest is at stake.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
B. Vijaysen Reddy, J.
The writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondent No.3 in issuing proceedings vide Rc.No.713/GGH, Nlg.2023 dated 04.03.2024 and thereby terminating the services of the petitioners without issuing any Show Cause Notice and calling for any explanation as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice.
2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are briefly stated hereunder :
(b) While so, the respondent No.3 issued impugned proceedings bearing Rc.No.713/GGH, Nlg.2023 dated 04.03.2024 cancelling the agreement of the petitioner No.1 and restoring the contract in the name of respondent No.4-L1. The following reasons have been cited in the impugned proceedings:
1. Wrong procedure and technical lapses have been noticed in awarding of tender, first being approved of tender to L3 Agency instead of L1 Agency.
2. It is also noticed that, L3 & L2 are the same property ownership agencies and they been blacklisted by the Government in violating the tender conditions by Sir Ronald Ross, Institute of Tropical and Communicable Diseases, Nallakunta, Hyderabad vie Rc.No.525/G1/SRRIT&CD/2022/375, Dated:13/09/2022 and also for operating in Mahabubabad. The blacklist of agency is hidden by Tender evaluation committee headed by the Superintendent of Government General Hospital, Nalgonda with malice intentions.
3. Further on 01.03.2024, it is noticed that, the (03) Sanitary employees attempted to suicide as the existing agency i.e., Sai Security Services Pvt. Ltd. is not paying their salaries regularly and harassing employees of the Hospital.
3. The petitioner contended that the impugned proceedings are arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent No.4, having finalized tenders and awarded contract to the petitioner No.1, claimed that wrong procedure has been followed. The tenders have been evaluated in accordance with the conditions prescribed in the tender document. The reasons cited for terminating the petitioner No.1 are uncalled for. So far as blacklisting is concerned, it is submitted that the petitioner No.1 is M/s. Sai Security Services Private Limited and not M/s. Sai Security Services, which is blacklisted. In any event, the said agency approached this Court in WP.No.36339 of 2022 wherein the blacklisting order was suspended. The allegation regarding suicide attempt made by three employees for not paying salaries regularly is without any basis. The petitioner No.1 has 184 employees and only three employees, for extraneous consideration, have blamed the management. The allegation made by the three employees is disproved by statement of salaries, Employees Provident Fund Contribution etc. annexed to the writ petition and the same are regularly filed before the concerned authorities in adherence to the terms of tender conditions and agreement.
4. The case of the respondent No.3 is that three employees, whose services were terminated, have attempted to commit suicide. The same resulted in disruption of services at Government General Hospital, Nalgonda. The petitioner
Association of Registration Plates v. Union of India and Others
Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd.
The court established that the principles of natural justice are not absolute in commercial transactions, particularly in tender processes, where public interest prevails.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of judicial review in contractual matters and the importance of fair play in the decision-making process. It highlights the freedom of the respondents to awa....
Judicial review in public procurement is limited; courts refrain from interference unless clear evidence of arbitrariness or bad faith is established.
The tendering authority's decision should not be interfered with unless it is mala fide, arbitrary, or irrational.
The court emphasized the importance of fairness, natural justice, and justification in contract termination and tender processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the termination of a tender based on reasons unrelated to the business of the petitioner and without a fair opportunity of hearing is violativ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.