ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Prl. Secretary Revenue – Appellant
Versus
Guntaka Sivangaendramma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Alok Aradhe, CJ.) :
Mr. D.V.Chalapathi Rao, learned Government Pleader for Assignment for the appellants.
Mr. V.R.Avula, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.30470 of 2012; 4257 and 5977 of 2014 and for the unofficial respondents in W.A.Nos.1099, 1100, 1101, 1121, 1142, 1150, 1151, 1169, 1170, 1207, 1222, 1231, 1237, 1238, 1246, 1708, 1709, 1715, 1719, 1743, 1747, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1761, 1764, 1765, 1767, 1768, 1785, 1786, 1797, 1798, 1799, 1801, 1802, 1804, 1806, 1849, 1857, 1873, 1938, 1989 and 2002 of 2017; 72, 326, 338 of 2018; and 581 of 2020.
Mr. S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. V.Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 in W.A.Nos.1222, 1237 and 1748 of 2017.
Mr. V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA).
Ms. T.Kanya Kumari, learned counsel representing Mr. M.Dhananjay Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC).
2. The bunch of intra court appeals emanate from the common order dated 29.12.2016 passed in W.P.No.18316 of 2008 and batch by the learned Single Judge. The writ petitions, namely W.P.Nos.30470 of 2012 and
State of Assam vs. Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma : (2015) 5 SCC 321
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Adarsh Seva Sahkari Samiti Limited : (2016) 12 SCC 493
U.A. Basheer vs. State of Karnataka : (2021) 5 SCC 313
Kothuru Babu Surendra Kumar (died) vs. Special Officer and Competent Authority, ULC
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Hari Ram : (2013) 4 SCC 280
M/s. Dehri Rohtas Light Railway Company Limited vs. District Board
Tukaram Kana Joshi vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation : (2013) 1 SCC 353
The competent authority's failure to issue notice to interested parties under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act invalidates the proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of due process.
Failure to issue notices to interested parties under the Urban Land Act invalidates land surplus declaration, violating principles of natural justice.
Mandatory compliance with statutory notice requirements is essential for valid proceedings under land regulation laws; non-compliance renders actions void and proceedings abated upon repeal.
The court ruled that failure to serve mandatory notices to legal representatives in surplus land proceedings renders such proceedings void, violating principles of natural justice.
Exemption, if validly granted and availed could survive in favour of the party only if it was properly used it as a defence in the proceedings under Section 8(4) / 10(3) of the ULC Act before the Com....
Point of law: Co operative society - Encroachment of Land - Right to fair compensation - Concept of equity, justice and good conscience is part of Indian law and can be applied by the Courts in certa....
Inordinate delay in filing a writ petition can bar the consideration of merits, especially when prior proceedings have reached finality.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.