IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J.
Balram Jadhav – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 19532, 20348 of 2024
Decided On : 13-09-2024
(A) Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014 – G.O.Ms. No. 80 dated 03.07.2024 – G.O.Rt. No. 118 dated 15.07.2024 – Writ petitions filed by office bearers of recognized associations challenging non-consideration for exemption from transfers – Court held that guidelines do not provide for such exemptions for office bearers, thus dismissing the petitions. (Paras 5, 11, 15)
(B) Transfer Guidelines – The court emphasized that the Higher Education Department is free to create its own transfer policy, and previous guidelines do not apply unless challenged. (Paras 13, 14)
Facts of the case: The petitioners, office bearers of recognized associations, sought exemption from transfers based on previous government orders, which were not included in the new transfer guidelines issued post-formation of Telangana.
Findings of Court: The court found no merit in the petitions as the new guidelines did not provide for exemptions for office bearers, and the petitioners failed to challenge the new guidelines.
Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners were entitled to exemptions from transfers under the new guidelines and the applicability of previous orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the new transfer guidelines did not include provisions for office bearers of recognized associations, and without challenging these guidelines, the petitioners could not claim any benefits from previous orders.
Result: Writ Petitions dismissed.
ORDER :
1. Since the lis in both these writ petitions is one and the same, they are heard together and are being disposed of by way of this common order.
2. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners, who are office bearers of the Government Junior Lecturers’ Association, Telangana and the Telangana Government College Teachers’ Association, respectively, for continuing them in their respective places of work, the present writ petitions are filed.
3. Heard Sri M. Surender Rao, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, learned counsel for the petitioners in both these writ petitions, and Sri S. Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader, representing the learned Additional Advocate General, on behalf of the respondents.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are office bearers of their respective employees’ associations, viz. the Government Junior Lecturers’ Association, Telangana, and the Telangana Government College Teachers’ Association, and that these associations are recognized the government of former State of Andhra Pradesh. As such, the government provided the office bearers certain privileges, particularly, the facility of exemption from transfers from districts, divisions, taluks or headquarters. The said facility was available to all the office bearers not restricting them to the Presidents and Secretary, but the same is limited for a continuous period of six years only. It is further submitted that after formation of the State of Telangana in terms of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014, the Government of Telangana issued G.O.Rt. No. 515 dated 16.03.2018, according the Other Duty facility to the Presidents and Secretaries of eleven service associations operating in this State. While so, in the year 2018, the Government lifted ban on transfers and issued transfer guidelines vide G.O.Ms. No. 61 dated 24.05.2018. Further, the Government has issued G.O.Rt. No. 116 dated 06.06.2018 framing certain guidelines for transfer of lecturers working in the Intermediate Education Department, and specific benefit of retention was provided to the office bearers of recognized employees’ unions, under Paragraph 9(c) of the said guidelines.
5. It is further submitted that in the above circumstances, some of the office bearers of the associations, for whom the benefit of stay has not been granted, approached this Court and filed W.P. Nos. 21502, 21573 and 21574 of 2018, and this Court was pleaded to grant interim orders in I.A. No. 1 of 2018 in the said writ petitions on 26.06.2018 directing the respondents to apply the benefit of paragraph 9(c) of the guidelines in the impending transfer counseling exercise treating them as representatives of the Government Junior Lecturers’ Association, Telangana, and the petitioners are continuing in their respective places of work by virtue of the said order. While the matter stood thus, the Government has issued G.O.Ms. No. 80 dated 03.07.2024 lifting the ban on transfer of employees working in the State Government, and in terms of the said G.O., the Department of Higher Education issued G.O.Rt. No. 118 dated 15.07.2024 framing certain guidelines for transfer of employees working in Collegiate Education, Technical Education and Intermediate Education Departments. In the said G.O., specific priority category is given to the office bearers of employees’ unions, recognized by the Government, under paragraph 6(c), which categorically stated that the instructions issued in Circular Memo No. 20914/SW-1/ A2/2012-1 dated 26.06.2012 read with Circular Memo No. 20914/SW-1/A2/2012-2 dated 30.06.2012 shall be followed scrupulously.
6. It is further submitted that the petitioners’ associations were officially recognized way back in 1981 and 1996 respectively vide G.O.Ms. No. 624, General Administration Department, dated 01.12.1981 and G.O.Ms. No. 3, Higher Education (VC.I) Department, dated 03.01.199
AI
The court ruled that new transfer guidelines do not provide exemptions for office bearers of recognized associations, and without challenging these guidelines, no benefits from previous orders can be....
Transfers of office bearers must adhere to statutory guidelines; failure to do so constitutes arbitrariness, violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The classification of government and non-government employees regarding transfer policies is valid, and the court cannot interfere in executive decisions unless statutory violations occur.
The court ruled that the Transfer Guidelines for Telangana Model Schools are lawful and applicable to petitioners, as the ban on transfers does not extend to employees of the Society.
Court upheld transfer of university faculty under administrative grounds, affirming limited scope for judicial review in administrative transfer matters.
Point of law: An order of transfer of an employee is a part of the service conditions and such order of transfer is not required to be interfered with lightly by a court of law in exercise of its dis....
Ratification from the competent authority is a prerequisite for the validity of transfer orders in public service.
Ratification from the competent authority is a prerequisite for the validity of transfer orders in public service, as established by the A.P. Education Act and relevant guidelines.
Transfer of employees is an essential condition of service governed by administrative exigencies, and courts should exercise restraint in interfering with such orders unless they are proven to be ill....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.