IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
S. Venkata Ramesh – Petitioner
Versus
The Government of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 17995 of 2023
Decided On : 12-09-2024
(A) Constitution of India – Articles 14, 16, 21 – Writ Petition challenging the Telangana Model School teachers (regulation of Transfers) guidelines 2023 – Petitioners contended that the guidelines are contrary to G.O.Ms. No. 81, Finance (HRM.I) Department, dated 18-06-2018, which imposed a ban on transfers and did not finalize the seniority list as directed by the court – Court held that the ban on transfers applies only to government employees and not to those working under the Society – Guidelines for entitlement points were upheld as lawful. (Paras 8, 17)
Facts of the case: Petitioners, appointed as Post Graduate Teachers (PGTs) in 2013 and 2014, challenged the Transfer Guidelines issued by the 2nd respondent, claiming they were contrary to existing government orders and discriminatory.
Findings of Court: The court directed the respondents to implement the Transfer Guidelines while ensuring a final seniority list is issued and entitlement points awarded as per the guidelines.
Issues: The main issues included the legality of the Transfer Guidelines, the status of the seniority list, and the basis for awarding entitlement points.
Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that the Transfer Guidelines are applicable to the petitioners as they are not government employees and directed adherence to the guidelines in conducting transfers.
Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to follow the Transfer Guidelines.
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
2. Heard Sri A. Phani Bhushan, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri S. Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for Respondents 1 to 3, Sri G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel for Respondents 4 to 33, Sri P. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Ch. Siddartha Sarma, learned counsel for Respondents 34 to 44 and Sri M. Surender Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, learned counsel for Respondents 45 to 53.
3. Petitioners claim to have been appointed as Post Graduate Teachers (PGTs) through notification No. 01/RMSA/Model Schools/2012, dated 06.02.2012, in two spells i.e. in 2013 and 2014 and working as such till date under Respondents 2 and 3. While so, the 2nd respondent issued Telangana Model Schools Teachers (Regulation of Transfers) Guidelines, 2023, for the teachers working in Telangana Model Schools (in short ‘the Transfer Guidelines’) to be followed while effecting transfers. In this Writ Petition, petitioners raised the following issues for adjudication by this Court:
(2) Whether the respondents have issued the final seniority list in the category of Post Graduate Teachers as directed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 35011 and 36093 of 2022 dated 17.11.2022.
(3) Whether awarding the entitlement points on the basis of service and station points is bad in law?
4. Learned counsel for petitioners contends that the Transfer Guidelines were issued contrary to G.O.Ms. No. 81, dated 18.06.2018 wherein the Government imposed ban on transfer of employees, as such, the 2nd respondent is estopped from issuing Transfer Guidelines. Further, the Head of the Department has also issued guidelines though ban on transfer issued by the Government is subsisting. Hence, the action of the 2nd respondent is illegal, unjust and contrary to G.O.Ms. No. 81, dated 18.06.2018. It is further contended that the Government of Telangana issued Memo No. 213/SEE.PROG.II/A2/1514, permitting the 2nd respondent to prepare a common merit list and to proceed with the appointment of PGTs. in Telangana Model Schools and till date, no such merit list was prepared by the 2nd respondent and the same was found fault by this Court in its common order dated 17.11.2022 in W.P. Nos. 35011 and 36093 of 2022, more specifically at Para No. 20.3. Learned counsel,
Dr. N. Ram Gopal v. Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam
AI
The court ruled that the Transfer Guidelines for Telangana Model Schools are lawful and applicable to petitioners, as the ban on transfers does not extend to employees of the Society.
The court ruled that new transfer guidelines do not provide exemptions for office bearers of recognized associations, and without challenging these guidelines, no benefits from previous orders can be....
Ratification from the competent authority is a prerequisite for the validity of transfer orders in public service.
Point of law: An order of transfer of an employee is a part of the service conditions and such order of transfer is not required to be interfered with lightly by a court of law in exercise of its dis....
Ratification from the competent authority is a prerequisite for the validity of transfer orders in public service, as established by the A.P. Education Act and relevant guidelines.
The G.R. on teacher transfers aligns with the RTE Act by maintaining Pupil-Teacher ratios and does not violate statutory rights of teachers.
The classification of government and non-government employees regarding transfer policies is valid, and the court cannot interfere in executive decisions unless statutory violations occur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.