C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
Syed Mohammed Shabbuddin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
(C.V. Bhaskar Reddy, J.) :
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
2. It is the case of the petitioner that his grandfather Mohammed Ghouseddin, was the owner and patted
Pratibha Singh and Another v. Shanti Devi Prasad and Another
Public authorities must follow statutory procedures for land acquisition; failure to do so violates constitutional rights.
The court emphasized that land acquisition must follow due process, and failure to do so renders the acquisition invalid, protecting the property rights of individuals.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the possession of property without due process of law violates Article 300A of the Constitution of India, and acquisition proceedings must adh....
The duty to compensate upon land acquisition is a constitutional safeguard, ensuring no individual is deprived of property without legal due process and fair compensation, embodied in Article 300A.
The State must comply with due process for land acquisition and compensate fairly; failure to follow procedures amounts to a constitutional violation.
Subsequent purchasers of land after the issuance of acquisition notifications cannot challenge the acquisition, and delay in filing a petition to challenge an acquisition should be viewed seriously.
Failure to follow due process in land acquisition and compensation amounts to a violation of constitutional property rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.