ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
P. Prem Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Mohan Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
(J. Sreenivas Rao, J.)
1. Civil Revision Petition Nos. 3314, 3315 and 3553 of 2024 are filed aggrieved by the orders dated 13.02.2024 passed in E.A. No.29 of 2023 in C.E.P. No.10 of 2022, E.A. No.28 of 2023 in C.E.P. No.11 of 2022 and E.A. No.27 of 2023 in C.E.P. No.12 of 2022 respectively passed by the Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, in allowing review applications.
1.1. Civil Revision Petition Nos. 3316 and 3552 of 2024 are filed aggrieved by the orders dated 28.02.2024 passed in I.A. No.667 of 2023 in A.O.P. No.507 of 2022 and I.A. No.819 of 2023 in A.O.P. No.505 of 2022 respectively passed by the XI Additional District and Sessions Judge at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, in allowing applications filed under Order VII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
2. Since all the civil revision petitions arise out of an award dated 23.05.2022 passed in Arbitration Application Nos. 133, 134 and 135 of 2019 by the learned Arbitrator, these matters have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.
3. Heard Sri R.A. Achuthanand, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sr
State of West Bengal and others v. Kamal Sengupta and another (2008) 8 SCC 612
BGS SGS Soma JV v. NHPC Limited (2020) 4 SCC 234
Sunil Vasudeva v. Sundar Gupta (2019) 17 SCC 385
Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Netaji Cricket Clubs (2005) 4 SCC 741
Union of India and others v. N.Murugesan and others (2022) 2 SCC 25
The court affirmed that review applications are maintainable when new evidence shows the specified value exceeds jurisdictional thresholds, confirming the Special Court's authority over commercial di....
The jurisdiction of courts over arbitration applications must adhere to specified pecuniary thresholds established by law, and errors in this regard can invalidate decisions.
Execution petitions for amounts above specified values must be filed in Commercial Courts, as Principal District Judges lack jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act.
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 grants jurisdiction to Commercial Courts for executing arbitral awards related to commercial disputes, emphasizing expedited resolution.
Financial transactions resembling financier dealings qualify as commercial disputes under Commercial Courts Act, requiring execution before Commercial Court.
Considering the issue of jurisdiction of civil Court to entertain an application under section 9 of the Act, 1996 in a dispute among the partners of LLP, the Court need not go into the question wheth....
Execution of arbitral awards must occur in the court where the original arbitration application was filed, as per Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.