G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
P. Sanjeeva Reddy – Appellant
Versus
P. Lakshmi Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is arising out of and against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2001 in O.S.No.790 of 1992 on the file of I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The defendant is the appellant.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff has filed a suit for partition against the defendant, claiming half share of the plaint schedule properties.
4. As per the recitals of the plaint, the plaintiff is the widow of Late P. Ramchandra Reddy and the defendant is the son of Late P. Ramchandra Reddy through his first wife by name Smt. Ratnamma. After the death of the first wife, the said Ramchandra Reddy married the plaintiff and the defendant was 3 months old when his mother died. Sri P. Ramchandra Reddy died on 17.05.1989 leaving behind the plaintiff and the defendant as surviving legal heirs. The parties are Hindus by religion and they are governed by Mithakshara school of law. Late P. Ramchandra Reddy acquired the plaint schedule properties with his self-acquired funds and upon his death, the plaintiff and the defendant have succeeded to equal shares to the plaint schedule prop
Sri Shivaji Balaram Haibatti v. Sri Avinash Maruthi Pawar
Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
Yumnam Ongbi Tampha Ibemma Devi v. Yumnam Joykumar Singh & others
Shobha Hymavathi Devi v. Setti Gangadhara Swamy & others
Ranganath Parameshwar Panditrao Mali & others v. Ekanth Gajanan Kulkarni & others
Chowdegowda @ Dorji & others v. C. Nagaraju & others
SPS Bakasubramanyam v. Suruttayan @ Andhali Padayachiand & others
Kondamma v. Joint Collector, Anantapur
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of legal provisions under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in determining the en....
Suit for partition - Partial partition not permissible - Admission of parties - Will duly established and cannot be held to be forge or fabricated one.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admissibility and proof of a Will should adhere to the mandate prescribed under the Evidence Act, and examination of attesting witnesses i....
The court upheld the trial Court's decree for partition, ruling that the alleged Will was not proved, affirming the properties as joint family assets.
The validity of a Will can be upheld despite procedural omissions if supported by sufficient evidence, and a partition suit may be dismissed if barred by limitation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.