Mutyala Vinod Kumar vs M. Shashikala Naidu - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 718

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 718

SHAMEEM AKTHER, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Mutyala Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Shashikala Naidu – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B SHASHIDHAR
For the Respondent: P S P SURESH KUMAR

JUDGMENT :

Shameem Akther, J.

This Family Court Appeal, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for short, ‘the Act’), is filed by the appellant, challenging the order, dated 30.06.2010, passed in FCOP No.456 of 2008 by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby, the subject FCOP filed by the appellant under Section 7 of the Act against the respondent No.1/wife and the respondent No.2/purchaser seeking (a) declaration that the appellant is the owner and possessor and the respondent No.1 is the Benamidar of the property bearing No.619-A, forming part of Survey No.403/1 (old) 120 (new) of Shaikpet Village and 102/1 of Hakimpet Village admeasuring 1478 square yards or 1236 square metres situated within the approved layout of the Jubilee Hills Cooperative House Building Society Limited (for short, ‘the Society’) at Road No.33, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad (hereafter referred to as ‘petition schedule property); (b) to direct the respondents to vacate and handover the vacant possession of the petition schedule property and on their failure, to evict them and put him in possession thereof; (c) to declare the title of the appellant and cancel the agreement of sale-cum-Irrevocable Gener

Click Here to Read the rest of this document