Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY,
Hari Sach Dev (Died Per LRs.) – Appellant
Versus
Gulzar Natarajan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order, dated 13.08.2009 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 4615 of 2000.
2. The petitioner herein filed W.P.No.4615 of 2000 seeking a writ of mandamus to approve retainable area of 1000 sq.yards as requested by him on 14.09.1999 and to pay compensation for the excess land of 1826.76 sq.mtrs. It is stated that the petitioner is absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring 2826.76 sq. mtrs in Sy. No.387 situated at Shaikpet Village and after the enactment of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short “ULC Act”), he filed declaration in C.C. No.E2/1869/76. After due enquiry, the orders under Section 8(4) of the ULC Act were passed and final statement under Section 9 of the ULC Act, was issued declaring that the petitioner is entitled to hold 1000 sq. mtrs as retainable area under Section 4(1)(b) of the ULC Act. Thereafter, the possession of surplus land was taken over by following due process of law on 06.02.1997. This Court, after considering the counter affidavit and the material on record, while observing that the retainable area of the petitioner was assigned in favour of third parties and thereb
The court emphasized that proving contempt requires establishing wilful disobedience of court orders, asserting jurisdiction under the Urban Land Ceiling Act mandates compliance for compensation.
Non-compliance with court orders constitutes contempt, requiring execution of the court's directive within stipulated time or facing penalties.
Law mandates lawful acquisition processes and due compensation for properties, highlighting the obligation to adhere to statutory timelines for notifications under the Right to Fair Compensation and ....
Willful non-compliance with a Court order constitutes civil contempt, requiring both knowledge of the order and deliberate disobedience, as reaffirmed in the Court’s findings.
(1) Discretion given to court in dealing with proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act is to be exercised for maintenance of court’s dignity and majesty of law.(2) Contempt of Court – Aggrieved party....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
