Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
T. Mahender – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compassionate appointment provisions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. government orders affecting employment eligibility. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. application processes and denials for aid. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments against the petitioner's claims. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. financial assistance eligibility criteria for families of victims. (Para 18 , 23) |
| 6. court's analysis on the rejection of petitioner's application. (Para 20) |
| 7. court's endorsement of previous decisions. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. disposition of the writ petition. (Para 25) |
ORDER :
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Heard Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for General Administration Department (GAD) appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.2 in rejecting the case of the petitioner for providing employment under the Scheme of compassionate appointment for the death of his father in extremists violence is illegal and for a consequential direction to provide the employment to the petitioner.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that his father, Tejavath Badyanayak, the President of Mandal Praja Parisad, Gandhari Mandal, was killed by th
The government must comply with established directives to provide employment and financial assistance to families of civilians killed in extremist violence, regardless of prior eligibility restrictio....
In the case of appointment considering the social and economic justice as enshrined in the constitution, denials of deserving cases are liable to be set aside. Further, the purpose of providing compa....
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and can only be granted based on fulfilling the norms laid down by the State's policy and eligibility criteria. No aspirant has a right t....
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly following a breadwinner's death; delayed applications undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointment is a privilege not a right, requiring timely application under applicable policy.
Acceptance of monetary compensation under a compassionate appointment scheme precludes further claims for such appointment, as per the applicant's undertaking.
Point of Law : As more than 30 years have passed since the father of the petitioner/appellant had expired, neither there is any useful purpose to issue any positive direction, nor the facts of the ca....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the policy regarding compassionate appointment and the applicability of subsequent amendments to the case of the petitioner.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
