Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Rolling Hills House Owners Association – Appellant
Versus
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent
ORDER :
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J.
The issues involved in both these writ petitions are intrinsically interconnected and hence, they are taken up and heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Writ Petition No.3698 of 2023, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , is filed by the petitioners, seeking the following relief:
“…to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the revised layout permit No.2755/Layout/CDA/PLG/HMDA/2002, dated 26.04.2013 and permit No.39591/HO/WZ/Cir.-11/2015, dated 20.01.2015 in File No.B/429/TPS/TP-11/GHMC/2014, and Revised Permit No.53374/HO/WZ/Cir-11/2016, 03.11.2017 in File No.117404/21/02/ 2017/HO/29 and Order in Lr.No.117404/21/02/2017/HO/29, dated 09.01.2023 passed by 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same, in the interest of justice.…”
3. Writ Petition No.16595 of 2023, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , is filed by the petitioners, seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more
Development authorities must adhere to original layout approvals, and changes affecting community rights without due process are illegal.
The court affirmed that property disputes should be resolved in civil courts, not through writ petitions, emphasizing the limited role of municipal authorities in such matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
