SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 295

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
Navayuga Engineering Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mahira Ventures Pvt Ltd – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

ORDER :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

Heard Sri Vimal Varma Vasi Reddy, learned counsel for the Applicant, and Sri E. Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. The present Arbitration Application is filed under Section 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the Act, 1996’) for appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the Applicant and Respondents.

FACTS:-

3. M/s Navayuga Legala Estates Private Limited (NLEPL), a group company of Navayuga Group, is the Applicant herein. It was in possession of land admeasuring Ac.25.10 guntas in Sy.No.82(p), 83(p) and 84(p) (opposite new municipal office, old Mumbai Highway, Serilingampally Village, Mandal and Municipality, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’).

4. 2nd respondent intended to enter into a Joint Development Agreement for development of the subject property as a freehold land after its de-notification from SEZ in all respects. 2nd respondent requested the Applicant to act as a facilitator to facilitate the de- notification of the subject land from SEZ under the applicable laws thereby to ensure handing over of the said land to NLEPL without any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top