SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 462

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD 
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.
Arun Kochouseph Chittilappilly And Others - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Telangana, Rep.,PP And Another - Respondent
Criminal Petition No.8650 of 2017 
Decided on : 30-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES
For the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR TG

The court ruled that civil disputes cannot be disguised as criminal offences, and allegations of conspiracy and forgery necessitate a full trial.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of criminal proceedings - Petitioners sought to quash proceedings in CC No.604 of 2016 for offences under Sections 420, 447, 427, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC - Allegations of conspiracy and criminal trespass in land dispute - Court emphasized that civil disputes cannot be cloaked as criminal offences and that the power to quash should be exercised sparingly. (Paras 1, 12, 14)

(B) Criminal liability - The court held that allegations of forgery and conspiracy necessitate a comprehensive trial, and mere pendency of civil suits does not bar criminal proceedings. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, accused in a land dispute, were alleged to have conspired to illegally grab land belonging to the principal of the de-facto complainant, leading to criminal charges.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the allegations warranted a full trial and that the petitioners' claims of civil nature were insufficient to quash the proceedings.

Issues: The main issues included whether the allegations constituted a civil dispute and if the criminal proceedings should be quashed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the allegations of criminal conspiracy and forgery required thorough examination in a trial, and the mere existence of civil suits did not preclude criminal action.

Result: Criminal petition dismissed.

ORDER :

E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2, 5, 10, 12 and 15 under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in CC No.604 of 2016 on the file of the learned XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Maheshwaram.

2. Heard Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned counsel representing on behalf of M/s.Bharadwaj Associates, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing learned Public Prosecutor for the State/1st respondent and Sri Kireet, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. Perused the record.

3. CC No.604 of 2016 on the file of the trial Court was registered for the offences under Sections 420, 447, 427, 468, 471 and 120-B read with Section 34 of IPC against the petitioners herein and others basing on the crime in FIR No.226 of 2013, of Police Station, Maheshwaram, Cyberabad District, on a complaint lodged by Mucha Yadagiri Reddy, i.e. the 2nd respondent herein and General Power of Attorney holder of one Gunuganti Ravindar Rao alleging that Wondarla Holidays Private Limited, which is the owner of adjacent lands of said Gunuganti Ravindar Rao, to whom the 2nd respondent herein is the general power of attorney, by colluding with the pattadars and others encroached into the lands of said Gunuganti Ravindar Rao and damaged the boundary stones with a view to grab the said property.

4. Basing on the said allegations, investigation was conducted and charge-sheet was laid into the trial Court, which Court, upon taking cognizance, assigned CC No.604 of 2016 to the same. The contents of the said charge-sheet are as under :

The 2nd respondent is the General Power of Attorney Holder of Gunuganti Ravindar Rao, who, purchased land admeasuring Ac.13-26 guntas in Sy.Nos.263, 265, 266, 267, 268, 270, 272, 273, 274 and 275 situated in Kongara Khurd-A Raviryal Village limits vide registered sale deed document bearing No.3042 of 2005. Since then Ravindhar Rao is in peaceful possession of the property, while his vendors were in possession of the property for the last 50 years. There is approximately 120 acres of land in the above survey numbers and all the 15 owners are in peaceful possession of their respective parts of the land. In the years 2011 and 2012 the representatives of "Wonderla Holidays Private Limited Company" approached and requested said Ravindhar Rao to sell the property to them. When Ravindhar Rao refused to sell the lands to them, Wonderla Holidays Pvt. Ltd. Company by conspiring with T.Sunil Kumar/A5, Raviryala villager G.Madusudhan Gupta-GPA holder of Wonderla and their vendors viz. (1) Smt.M.Sarala Kumari/A7, (2) Smt.M.Sunanda Raj/A8, (3) Smt.M.Vijaya Laxmi/A9, (4) Nimma Sujeevan Reddy/A4 and (5) A.Vijay Kumar/A6 along with the vendors and GPA holders of the documents bearing Nos.1637/2012, 1454/2012, 1455/2012, 1638/2012, 18/25/2012 and 691/2012, with an intention to cause wrongful loss to the complainant's principal, cheated him by executing the above said registered documents showing boundaries differently from the link documents and got them registered at the SRO, Maheshwaram. Basing on the wrong boundaries shown in the above registered documents, Wanderla company criminally trespassed into the lands of Ravindhar Rao and removed the existing boundaries. Nimma Ravinder Reddy has assisted directly and indirectly for the criminal trespass and registering the documents with wrong boundaries. Further, Wonderlaw Holidays Limited filed a civil suit in OS No.2202 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District against Ravinder Rao seeking Injunction. Therefore the complainant has requested the police for necessary action against the above said individuals.

5. Basing on the allegations made in the above complaint, LW-22/M.Gangadhar, Inspector of police, Maheshwaram Police Station registered a case in FIR No.266 of 2013 for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top