Kamsa Bai vs Revenue Divisional Officer - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 689

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 689

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Kamsa Bai – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S SURENDER REDDY
For the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS

JUDGMENT :

Tirumala Devi Eada, J.

This appeal, under Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, (for short ‘the Act’) is filed by the appellants, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2009 passed in O.P.No.11 of 2007 by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Adilabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’).

2. The appellants are aggrieved by the order of trial Court granting a share in the compensation to respondent Nos.2 to 10 and 12 herein. Their grievance is that they were the owners and possessors of the land that was acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer/Revenue Divisional Officer, Adilabad and that the compensation awarded ought to have been granted entirely to them and that the trial Court has erred in granting share in the compensation to respondent Nos.2 to 10 and 12.

3. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the trial Court.

4. The facts of the case in brief are that the matter was referred to the trial Court by the Land Acquisition Officer under Section 30 of the Act to decide the title in respect of the land acquired in Survey No.10/A extending to Ac.02-00 guntas and in survey No.12/6/126 and 12/7/128