Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
K. Sarveswar Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discrimination in remuneration for part-time lecturers. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. obligation to implement government orders on remuneration. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 3. court’s directive for implementation of g.o. (Para 6) |
| 4. arguments from government and petitioners. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. non-rejection of requests without reasons. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri Jurispath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the remuneration for 12 months to the part time Junior Lecturers (Vocational) working in Government Junior colleges on par with contract Lecturers, by implementing the G.O.Rt.No.95 dated 25.06.2019 is arbitrary, irrational and contrary to the principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Consequently, direct the respondents to implement the G.O.Rt.No.95 dated 25.06.2019 by paying the arrears from the date of issuance o
Court affirms that equal remuneration principles demand that government orders must be uniformly implemented, requiring reasoned justifications for any rejection.
The government order fixing salary for part-time lecturers in government law colleges cannot be directly applied to part-time lecturers in minority aided institutions.
The court established that part-time lecturers, despite their contractual status, are entitled to fair remuneration reflecting their job responsibilities, emphasizing the principle of equal pay for e....
Point of law: Pleader for Services submits that Pay Revision, 2015 does not include part-time lecturers and is applicable only to permanent employees. The petitioners had given an undertaking that th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of equal pay for equal work, as enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and its application to the payment of remunerati....
(1) Part-time contractual instructors/teachers appointed by State Government under the Scheme are in no way inferior to regular teachers or Assistant Teachers appointed otherwise under the scheme.(2)....
The court reaffirmed that all teachers in aided educational institutions must be treated equally regarding career advancement benefits, and any arbitrary deductions in service years violate the princ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
