Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA
Tammana Seetaramanjaneyulu Died Per L.R. – Appellant
Versus
Chittimalla Sudhakar Rao R/o Srikrishna Colony, Warangal DT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. Sujana, J.
This appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2006 passed in O.S.No.89 of 1998 on the file of III Additional District Judge, Warangal. The suit was filed for recovery of Rs.5,25,000/- with future interest @ 36% p.a., on the principal amount of Rs.3,50,000/-.
2. The defendant, who was involved in a small export business, became acquainted with the sons of plaintiff, who owns a rice mill business. As they belonged to the same caste, the family members of both parties became acquainted with each other. The defendant would often borrow money from the plaintiff and his family members. On 01.08.1997, the plaintiff lent Rs.3,50,000/- to the defendant under a promissory note, with interest @ 36% p.a, for the defendant's joint Hindu family needs and rice mill business. The defendant's father had also requested the plaintiff over the phone to advance the loan. Despite promising to repay within a month, the defendant failed to do so, and instead kept postponing the repayment on various pretexts. Plaintiff then issued a legal notice on 19.02.1998, which was returned after seven days with the endorsement "addressee seven d
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
